Why Trees Exist and What Linked Lists and Arrays Cannot Do in DSA C - Test Your Knowledge

Practice - 5 Tasks

1fill in blank

easy

Complete the code to create a new tree node with given data.

DSA C

struct Node* createNode(int data) {
    struct Node* newNode = (struct Node*)malloc(sizeof(struct Node));
    newNode->data = [1];
    newNode->left = NULL;
    newNode->right = NULL;
    return newNode;
}

Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'

ANULL

Bdata

C0

D*data

Attempts:

3 left

💡 Hint

Common Mistakes

Assigning NULL or zero instead of the input data.

Using pointer dereference incorrectly.

The new node's data field should be set to the given data value.

2fill in blank

medium

Complete the code to check if a binary tree node is a leaf node.

DSA C

int isLeaf(struct Node* node) {
    return (node->left == NULL && node->right [1] NULL);
}

Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'

A!=

B>

C==

D<

Attempts:

3 left

💡 Hint

Common Mistakes

Using inequality operator instead of equality.

Checking only one child pointer.

A leaf node has both left and right pointers equal to NULL.

3fill in blank

hard

Fix the error in the code that inserts a node into a binary search tree.

DSA C

struct Node* insert(struct Node* root, int data) {
    if (root == NULL) {
        return createNode([1]);
    }
    if (data < root->data) {
        root->left = insert(root->left, data);
    } else {
        root->right = insert(root->right, data);
    }
    return root;
}

Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'

A*data

Broot

C&data

Ddata

Attempts:

3 left

💡 Hint

Common Mistakes

Passing root pointer instead of data value.

Using pointer dereference incorrectly.

When creating a new node, pass the data value, not the root or pointer.

4fill in blank

hard

Fill both blanks to create a function that counts nodes in a binary tree.

DSA C

int countNodes(struct Node* root) {
    if (root == NULL) {
        return [1];
    }
    return 1 + countNodes(root->[2]) + countNodes(root->right);
}

Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'

A0

B1

Cleft

Dright

Attempts:

3 left

💡 Hint

Common Mistakes

Returning 1 for NULL node.

Using wrong child pointer name.

Return 0 for empty tree; recursively count left subtree nodes.

5fill in blank

hard

Fill all three blanks to create a function that searches a value in a binary search tree.

DSA C

int searchBST(struct Node* root, int key) {
    if (root == NULL) {
        return 0;
    }
    if (key == root->data) {
        return 1;
    } else if (key [1] root->data) {
        return searchBST(root->[2], key);
    } else {
        return searchBST(root->[3], key);
    }
}

Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'

A<

B>

Cleft

Dright

Attempts:

3 left

💡 Hint

Common Mistakes

Using wrong comparison operators.

Searching wrong subtree based on comparison.

If key is less, search left subtree; else search right subtree.

Practice

1. Why do trees exist as a data structure when we already have arrays and linked lists?

easy

A. Because trees allow hierarchical data representation which arrays and linked lists cannot efficiently provide.

B. Because trees use less memory than arrays and linked lists.

C. Because trees are easier to implement than arrays and linked lists.

D. Because trees always have faster access time than arrays and linked lists.

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand the limitation of arrays and linked lists

   Arrays and linked lists store data linearly, which makes representing hierarchical relationships difficult and inefficient.

2. Step 2: Identify the advantage of trees

   Trees naturally represent hierarchical data with parent-child relationships, allowing efficient searching and organization of such data.

3. Final Answer:

   Because trees allow hierarchical data representation which arrays and linked lists cannot efficiently provide. -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Hierarchical data needs trees = A [OK]

Hint: Trees handle hierarchy; arrays and lists are linear [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Thinking trees always use less memory
• Assuming trees are simpler to implement
• Believing trees always have faster access time

2. Which of the following is the correct way to declare a simple binary tree node in C?

easy

A. struct Node { int data; Node* left; Node* right; }; typedef Node;

B. struct Node { int data; struct Node left; struct Node right; };

C. typedef struct Node { int data; struct Node* left; struct Node* right; } Node;

D. typedef struct { int data; struct Node* left; struct Node* right; } Node;

Solution

1. Step 1: Check struct declaration syntax in C

   In C, to declare a struct with pointers to itself, use 'struct Node*' for left and right child pointers.

2. Step 2: Validate typedef usage

   typedef struct Node { int data; struct Node* left; struct Node* right; } Node; correctly defines the struct and typedefs it as Node for easy use.

3. Final Answer:

   typedef struct Node { int data; struct Node* left; struct Node* right; } Node; -> Option C

4. Quick Check:

   Correct self-referential struct syntax = B [OK]

Hint: Use 'struct Node*' for child pointers in C structs [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using 'Node*' inside struct before typedef
• Declaring child nodes as struct instead of pointers
• Incorrect typedef syntax

3. Consider the following C code that creates a simple binary tree node and prints its data:

typedef struct Node {
  int data;
  struct Node* left;
  struct Node* right;
} Node;

int main() {
  Node root = {10, NULL, NULL};
  printf("%d", root.data);
  return 0;
}

What is the output of this program?

medium

A. Compilation error

B. 0

C. Garbage value

D. 10

Solution

1. Step 1: Analyze struct initialization

   The root node is initialized with data = 10 and both children as NULL pointers.

2. Step 2: Check printf output

   Printing root.data will output 10 as it is explicitly set.

3. Final Answer:

   10 -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   Initialized data printed = 10 [OK]

Hint: Initialized struct fields print their values directly [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Assuming uninitialized fields print garbage
• Confusing pointer NULL with data value
• Expecting compilation error due to struct

4. The following C code attempts to create a binary tree node but has an error:

typedef struct Node {
  int data;
  struct Node* left;
  struct Node* right;
} Node;

int main() {
  Node* root;
  root->data = 5;
  root->left = NULL;
  root->right = NULL;
  return 0;
}

What is the error and how to fix it?

medium

A. root is uninitialized pointer; fix by allocating memory with malloc.

B. root should be a struct, not a pointer; fix by declaring 'Node root;' instead.

C. Missing semicolon after struct definition; add semicolon.

D. Cannot assign NULL to pointers; use 0 instead.

Solution

1. Step 1: Identify pointer initialization issue

   root is declared as a pointer but not assigned memory, so accessing root->data causes undefined behavior.

2. Step 2: Fix by allocating memory

   Use malloc to allocate memory before accessing members: root = malloc(sizeof(Node));

3. Final Answer:

   root is uninitialized pointer; fix by allocating memory with malloc. -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Pointer must point to allocated memory = C [OK]

Hint: Always malloc before using pointer to struct [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using pointer without allocation
• Confusing pointer and struct variable
• Ignoring memory allocation errors

5. You want to represent a company's organizational chart where each manager can have multiple employees reporting to them. Why is a tree a better data structure than arrays or linked lists for this, and how would you implement it in C?

hard

A. Arrays are better because they allow random access; implement with a large array of employees.

B. Trees represent hierarchical relationships naturally; implement using nodes with data and a list of child pointers.

C. Linked lists are better because they are simple; implement with a single linked list of all employees.

D. Trees are not suitable; use hash tables instead for fast lookup.

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand the hierarchical nature of organizational charts

   Each manager can have multiple employees, forming a tree-like structure with parent-child relationships.

2. Step 2: Compare data structures for this use case

   Arrays and linked lists are linear and cannot represent multiple children per node efficiently; trees allow multiple children per node naturally.

3. Step 3: Implementation approach in C

   Use a struct with data and a dynamic array or linked list of pointers to child nodes to represent multiple employees under a manager.

4. Final Answer:

   Trees represent hierarchical relationships naturally; implement using nodes with data and a list of child pointers. -> Option B

5. Quick Check:

   Hierarchy needs trees with child lists = A [OK]

Hint: Use trees with child lists for multi-level hierarchy [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Trying to use arrays for hierarchical data
• Using single linked list for multi-child nodes
• Ignoring the need for multiple children pointers