Min-heap keeps smallest frequency on top, so popping prints from least to most frequent.
Step 2: Identify output order issue
Printing while popping will print elements from lowest to highest frequency, not top frequent first.
Final Answer:
The output order is reversed; elements print from least to most frequent -> Option B
Quick Check:
Min-heap pop order = ascending frequency [OK]
Hint: Min-heap pops smallest first, so output order is reversed [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Confusing pair order in heap
Wrong pop condition for heap size
Ignoring output order from heap pops
5. Given an array nums = {5,3,1,1,1,3,73,1} and k = 2, which approach correctly finds the top K frequent elements using a heap and handles ties properly?
hard
A. Use a min-heap of size k with (frequency, element) pairs, replacing when frequency is higher
B. Use a hash map only without any heap
C. Sort the array and pick the last k elements
D. Use a min-heap of (frequency, element) pairs and pop k times
Solution
Step 1: Count frequencies of elements
Frequencies: 1->4, 3->2, 5->1, 73->1.
Step 2: Use min-heap of size k to keep top frequent elements
Insert pairs (freq, element). If heap size exceeds k, pop smallest frequency. This keeps top k frequent elements efficiently.
Step 3: Handle ties by frequency naturally in heap
Elements with same frequency are handled by heap order; ties do not break correctness.
Final Answer:
Use a min-heap of size k with (frequency, element) pairs, replacing when frequency is higher -> Option A
Quick Check:
Min-heap size k keeps top frequent elements [OK]
Hint: Min-heap size k keeps top frequent elements, replacing lower freq [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using max-heap and popping k times without size limit
Sorting array instead of frequencies
Ignoring heap for frequency tracking
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.