The maximum width is the largest number of nodes present at any single level (depth) of the binary tree.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
How can we track node positions to calculate the maximum width of a binary tree?
Assign an index to each node as if the tree was a complete binary tree: root = 0, left child = 2 * parent_index + 1, right child = 2 * parent_index + 2. This helps measure width by subtracting minimum from maximum indices at each level.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
What data structure is commonly used to traverse levels of a binary tree for width calculation?
A queue is used for level order traversal (breadth-first search) to visit nodes level by level and track their positions.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
Why do we subtract the minimum index from the maximum index at each level when finding the width?
Because node indices may not start at zero for each level, subtracting the minimum index normalizes positions to avoid large gaps and gives the actual width as (max_index - min_index + 1).
Click to reveal answer
beginner
What is the time complexity of finding the maximum width of a binary tree using level order traversal?
The time complexity is O(n), where n is the number of nodes, because each node is visited once during the traversal.
Click to reveal answer
What does the maximum width of a binary tree represent?
AThe total number of nodes
BThe height of the tree
CThe depth of the deepest leaf
DThe number of nodes at the widest level
✗ Incorrect
Maximum width is the count of nodes at the level with the most nodes.
Which traversal method is best suited to find the maximum width of a binary tree?
ALevel order traversal (BFS)
BPreorder traversal
CInorder traversal
DPostorder traversal
✗ Incorrect
Level order traversal visits nodes level by level, which helps count nodes per level.
How are node indices assigned to calculate width in a binary tree?
ARoot = 0; left child = 2 * parent + 1; right child = 2 * parent + 2
BRoot = 1; left child = parent + 1; right child = parent + 2
CRoot = 0; left child = parent - 1; right child = parent + 1
DRoot = 1; left child = 2 * parent; right child = 2 * parent + 1
✗ Incorrect
This indexing simulates a complete binary tree to measure width accurately.
Why do we add 1 after subtracting min index from max index to get width?
ATo count only leaf nodes
BTo correct for zero-based indexing
CBecause width counts nodes inclusively between min and max indices
DTo adjust for tree height
✗ Incorrect
Width includes both ends, so we add 1 to count all nodes in the range.
What is the space complexity of the maximum width calculation using a queue?
AO(n^2), quadratic space
BO(n), where n is the maximum number of nodes at any level
CO(log n), where n is total nodes
DO(1), constant space
✗ Incorrect
The queue holds nodes of one level at a time, which can be up to the maximum width.
Explain how to calculate the maximum width of a binary tree using level order traversal and node indexing.
Think about visiting nodes level by level and numbering them.
You got /5 concepts.
Describe why indexing nodes like a complete binary tree helps in finding the maximum width.
Imagine numbering seats in a theater row even if some are empty.
You got /4 concepts.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What does the "maximum width" of a binary tree represent?
easy
A. The height of the tree from root to the deepest leaf
B. The number of leaf nodes in the tree
C. The total number of nodes in the tree
D. The largest value of (lastIndex - firstIndex + 1) at any single level of the tree
Solution
Step 1: Understand the definition of width in a binary tree
The width of a level is defined as (rightmost node index - leftmost node index + 1), where children indices are 2*parent and 2*parent+1. Maximum width is the maximum over all levels.
Step 2: Compare with other tree properties
Height is maximum depth, total nodes is size, leaves are terminal nodes, none represent width.
Final Answer:
The largest value of (lastIndex - firstIndex + 1) at any single level of the tree -> Option D
Quick Check:
Width = max(lastIndex - firstIndex + 1) [OK]
Hint: Width means max (last - first +1) at one level using indices, not height or total nodes [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Confusing width with height
Thinking width is total nodes
Thinking width is just count of nodes ignoring gaps
Mixing width with leaf count
2. Which of the following C code snippets correctly declares a queue node structure for level order traversal in maximum width calculation?
easy
A. typedef struct QueueNode { struct TreeNode* node; unsigned int index; struct QueueNode* next; } QueueNode;
B. struct QueueNode { int value; struct QueueNode* prev; };
C. typedef struct QueueNode { struct TreeNode* node; int level; } QueueNode;
D. struct QueueNode { struct TreeNode* node; struct QueueNode* next; int data; };
Solution
Step 1: Identify required fields for maximum width queue node
We need a pointer to tree node, an index for position, and next pointer for queue linking.
Step 2: Check each option for these fields
typedef struct QueueNode { struct TreeNode* node; unsigned int index; struct QueueNode* next; } QueueNode; has node pointer, index, and next pointer correctly typed.
Final Answer:
typedef struct QueueNode { struct TreeNode* node; unsigned int index; struct QueueNode* next; } QueueNode; -> Option A
Quick Check:
Queue node needs node, index, next [OK]
Hint: Queue node must store tree node pointer and index for width [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Missing index field for position tracking
Using wrong pointer types
Confusing prev and next pointers
3. Given the following binary tree and code snippet, what is the maximum width printed?
Assume root index 0. Level 0: 1 (idx 0), width=1 Level 1: 2 (idx 0), 3 (idx 1), width=2 Level 2: 4 (idx 0, left of 2), 5 (idx 3, right of 3), width=4
Step 2: Determine maximum width
Maximum span (last - first +1) is 4 at level 2.
Final Answer:
4 -> Option C
Quick Check:
Max width = 4 at level 2 [OK]
Hint: Trace BFS with indices: level spans 1,2,4 -> max 4 [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Counting only nodes per level (gets 2)
Wrong child index calculation
Misreading tree connections
Forgetting gaps in span
4. Identify the bug in this C code snippet for calculating maximum width of a binary tree:
unsigned int maximumWidth(struct TreeNode* root) {
if (!root) return 0;
unsigned int maxWidth = 0;
QueueNode* queue = createQueue();
enqueue(queue, root, 0);
while (!isEmpty(queue)) {
unsigned int size = queueSize(queue);
unsigned int firstIndex = queueFrontIndex(queue);
unsigned int lastIndex = queueBackIndex(queue);
maxWidth = max(maxWidth, lastIndex - firstIndex + 1);
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
QueueNode* curr = dequeue(queue);
if (curr->node->left) enqueue(queue, curr->node->left, 2 * curr->index);
if (curr->node->right) enqueue(queue, curr->node->right, 2 * curr->index + 1);
}
}
return maxWidth;
}
medium
A. The loop uses 'i < size' but size changes inside the loop
B. The max function is not defined or included
C. The index calculation for children should add 1 to avoid overlap
D. Indexing starts at 0, should start at 1 to avoid zero-based errors
Solution
Step 1: Check for missing function definitions
The code uses max() but does not define or include it, causing compile error.
Step 2: Verify other parts for correctness
Indexing from 0 is valid, size is fixed per loop iteration, child index calculation 2*i and 2*i+1 is correct for span.
Final Answer:
The max function is not defined or included -> Option B
Quick Check:
Undefined max() causes error [OK]
Hint: Check if all functions like max() are defined or included [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Assuming max() is built-in in C
Thinking indexing must start at 1
Believing queue size changes inside loop
5. You have a binary tree where some levels have missing nodes between existing nodes. How should you calculate the maximum width to include these gaps correctly?
hard
A. Use node indices based on complete binary tree positions to measure width including gaps
B. Count only existing nodes at each level ignoring gaps
C. Calculate width as the difference between max and min node values at each level
D. Use height of the tree multiplied by 2 as width