Binary Search on Answer Technique in DSA C - Time & Space Complexity

Time Complexity: Binary Search on Answer Technique

O(log n)

Understanding Time Complexity

We want to understand how fast the binary search on answer technique works when finding a solution by guessing and checking.

How does the number of guesses grow as the range of possible answers grows?

Scenario Under Consideration

Analyze the time complexity of the following code snippet.

int binarySearchOnAnswer(int low, int high) {
    while (low <= high) {
        int mid = low + (high - low) / 2;
        if (canDo(mid)) {
            high = mid;
        } else {
            low = mid + 1;
        }
    }
    return low;
}

// canDo(mid) checks if mid is a valid answer

This code tries to find the smallest valid answer by repeatedly guessing the middle value and narrowing the search range.

Identify Repeating Operations

Identify the loops, recursion, array traversals that repeat.

• Primary operation: The while loop that halves the search range each time.
• How many times: The loop runs until the range is reduced to zero, about log2 of the initial range size.

How Execution Grows With Input

Each guess cuts the search space roughly in half, so the number of guesses grows slowly even if the range grows large.

Input Size (range)	Approx. Operations (guesses)
10	About 4 guesses
100	About 7 guesses
1000	About 10 guesses

Pattern observation: Doubling the range adds only one more guess, showing slow growth.

Final Time Complexity

Time Complexity: O(log n)

This means the number of steps grows slowly, doubling the range only adds one more step.

Common Mistake

[X] Wrong: "The loop runs n times because it checks every number in the range."

[OK] Correct: The loop does not check every number; it cuts the range in half each time, so it runs much fewer times.

Interview Connect

Understanding this technique shows you can solve problems efficiently by smart guessing, a skill valued in many coding challenges.

Self-Check

"What if the canDo() check took linear time instead of constant time? How would the overall time complexity change?"

Practice

1. What is the main idea behind the Binary Search on Answer technique?

easy

A. Searching for the answer by repeatedly dividing the search space based on feasibility

B. Sorting the array before applying binary search

C. Using binary search only on sorted arrays

D. Applying binary search to find the maximum element in an array

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand the problem context

   Binary Search on Answer is used when the answer lies within a range and we can check feasibility for a candidate answer.

2. Step 2: Explain the technique

   We repeatedly pick a middle value in the answer range and check if it satisfies the problem's conditions, then narrow the range accordingly.

3. Final Answer:

   Searching for the answer by repeatedly dividing the search space based on feasibility -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Binary Search on Answer = Divide and check feasibility [OK]

Hint: Think of answer range, not array elements, for binary search [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Confusing it with normal binary search on arrays
• Trying to apply without a feasibility check
• Assuming answer must be in the input array

2. Which of the following is the correct syntax to start a binary search on answer in C for an integer answer between low and high?

easy

A. for (int mid = low; mid <= high; mid++) { /* check feasibility */ }

B. do { mid = (low + high) / 2; /* check feasibility */ } while (low < high);

C. if (low < high) { mid = (low + high) / 2; /* check feasibility */ }

D. while (low <= high) { int mid = (low + high) / 2; /* check feasibility */ }

Solution

1. Step 1: Identify the binary search loop structure

   Binary search uses a while loop with condition low <= high to narrow the search space.

2. Step 2: Confirm calculation of mid and feasibility check

   Mid is calculated as (low + high) / 2 inside the loop, then feasibility is checked to adjust low or high.

3. Final Answer:

   while (low <= high) { int mid = (low + high) / 2; /* check feasibility */ } -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   Binary search loop = while(low <= high) [OK]

Hint: Use while loop with low <= high for binary search [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using for loop instead of while
• Incorrect loop condition like low < high
• Not updating low or high inside loop

3. Consider the following C code snippet using binary search on answer to find the minimum maximum load to split an array into m subarrays:

int canSplit(int* arr, int n, int m, int maxLoad) {
    int count = 1, currentSum = 0;
    for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
        if (arr[i] > maxLoad) return 0;
        if (currentSum + arr[i] > maxLoad) {
            count++;
            currentSum = arr[i];
        } else {
            currentSum += arr[i];
        }
    }
    return count <= m;
}

int binarySearchAnswer(int* arr, int n, int m) {
    int low = 0, high = 0;
    for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) high += arr[i];
    int ans = high;
    while (low <= high) {
        int mid = (low + high) / 2;
        if (canSplit(arr, n, m, mid)) {
            ans = mid;
            high = mid - 1;
        } else {
            low = mid + 1;
        }
    }
    return ans;
}

int main() {
    int arr[] = {7, 2, 5, 10, 8};
    int n = 5, m = 2;
    printf("%d", binarySearchAnswer(arr, n, m));
    return 0;
}

What is the output of this program?

medium

A. 18

B. 15

C. 20

D. 10

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand the problem and code logic

   The code finds the minimum maximum load to split the array into 2 subarrays so that the largest sum among subarrays is minimized.

2. Step 2: Dry run with given array

   Possible splits: - [7,2,5] and [10,8] max sums 14 and 18 -> max 18 - [7,2] and [5,10,8] max sums 9 and 23 -> max 23 - [7] and [2,5,10,8] max sums 7 and 25 -> max 25 Minimum max load is 18.

3. Final Answer:

   18 -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Minimum max load = 18 [OK]

Hint: Check feasibility by simulating splits, pick minimal max sum [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Choosing sum of all elements as answer
• Not considering feasibility function logic
• Confusing minimum max load with total sum

4. The following code tries to find the minimum maximum time to complete tasks by binary searching on answer. Identify the bug:

int canComplete(int* tasks, int n, int m, int maxTime) {
    int count = 1, currentTime = 0;
    for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
        if (tasks[i] > maxTime) return 0;
        if (currentTime + tasks[i] >= maxTime) {
            count++;
            currentTime = tasks[i];
        } else {
            currentTime += tasks[i];
        }
    }
    return count <= m;
}

medium

A. The count variable should start from 0, not 1

B. The condition should be currentTime + tasks[i] > maxTime, not >= maxTime

C. The function should return count >= m instead of count <= m

D. The loop should run from i = 1 instead of i = 0

Solution

1. Step 1: Analyze the feasibility condition

   The condition currentTime + tasks[i] >= maxTime causes a new segment even when sum equals maxTime, which is incorrect.

2. Step 2: Correct the condition

   It should be currentTime + tasks[i] > maxTime to start a new segment only when sum exceeds maxTime.

3. Final Answer:

   The condition should be currentTime + tasks[i] > maxTime, not >= maxTime -> Option B

4. Quick Check:

   Use > for splitting condition, not >= [OK]

Hint: Use strict greater than (>) to split segments [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using >= causes extra segments
• Starting count from 0 instead of 1
• Returning wrong comparison for count and m

5. You want to find the minimum maximum height to cut trees so that the total wood collected is at least m units. Given an array trees[] of heights, which approach correctly applies binary search on answer to solve this problem?

hard

A. Set low = min height, high = max height; check if sum of all trees is >= m; adjust low or high accordingly

B. Sort trees, then binary search for the tree with height closest to m

C. Set low = 0, high = max height in trees; check if cutting at mid yields enough wood; adjust low or high accordingly

D. Use binary search on the array indices to find the tree that yields maximum wood

Solution

1. Step 1: Define the search space for cutting height

   The cutting height can vary from 0 to the tallest tree height.

2. Step 2: Check feasibility by summing wood collected at mid height

   For a candidate mid, sum wood = sum of (tree height - mid) if positive; check if sum >= m.

3. Step 3: Adjust search space based on feasibility

   If enough wood is collected, try higher cut (low = mid + 1) to minimize cut height; else lower cut (high = mid - 1).

4. Final Answer:

   Set low = 0, high = max height in trees; check if cutting at mid yields enough wood; adjust low or high accordingly -> Option C

5. Quick Check:

   Binary search on cut height range with feasibility check [OK]

Hint: Binary search on cutting height, not on tree indices [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Binary searching on sorted array instead of answer range
• Using sum of all trees without cutting logic
• Confusing indices with answer values