Sliding Window Maximum Using Deque in DSA C - Cheat Sheet & Quick Revision

Recall & Review

beginner

What is the main purpose of using a deque in the Sliding Window Maximum problem?

A deque helps keep track of indices of elements in the current window in a way that the front always holds the index of the maximum element. It allows efficient insertion and removal from both ends to maintain the maximum in O(1) amortized time per operation.

intermediate

In the Sliding Window Maximum algorithm using deque, why do we remove elements from the back of the deque when a new element arrives?

We remove elements from the back if they are smaller than the new element because they cannot be the maximum if a bigger element is present later. This keeps the deque elements in decreasing order of their values.

beginner

What does the deque store in the Sliding Window Maximum algorithm?

The deque stores indices of elements from the array, not the elements themselves. This helps to check if an element is out of the current window and to access the element's value easily.

intermediate

How do you know when to remove the front element of the deque in the Sliding Window Maximum algorithm?

If the index at the front of the deque is outside the current window (less than current index minus window size plus one), it should be removed because it is no longer part of the window.

beginner

What is the time complexity of the Sliding Window Maximum algorithm using a deque?

The time complexity is O(n) because each element is added and removed from the deque at most once, making all operations linear in total.

What does the deque store in the Sliding Window Maximum algorithm?

A Window sizes

B Actual element values

C Sum of elements

D Indices of elements

The deque stores indices to efficiently check window boundaries and access element values.

Why do we remove elements from the back of the deque when a new element arrives?

A Because they are smaller than the new element

B Because they are larger than the new element

C To keep the deque size fixed

D To maintain ascending order

Smaller elements at the back are removed because the new bigger element will overshadow them for maximum.

When do we remove the front element of the deque?

A When it is outside the current window

B When it is the maximum element

C When it is inside the current window

D When the deque is empty

The front element is removed if its index is outside the current sliding window.

What is the time complexity of the Sliding Window Maximum algorithm using deque?

A O(n^2)

B O(n log n)

C O(n)

D O(log n)

Each element is added and removed at most once, so the total time is linear.

What is the main advantage of using a deque for this problem?

A It sorts the window elements

B It allows constant time access to the maximum

C It stores all elements permanently

D It reduces memory usage

Deque maintains elements in a way that the maximum is always at the front, allowing O(1) access.

Explain step-by-step how the deque is updated when sliding the window over the array.

Think about how the deque keeps only useful elements for maximum.

Describe why the Sliding Window Maximum problem can be solved in O(n) time using a deque.

Focus on how many times each element enters and leaves the deque.

Practice

1. What is the main purpose of using a deque in the Sliding Window Maximum problem?

easy

A. To store the sum of elements in each window

B. To sort the array elements before processing

C. To reverse the array for easier traversal

D. To store indices of elements in a way that helps find the maximum in O(1) time per window

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand the role of deque

   A deque stores indices of elements in a way that the front always has the index of the maximum element for the current window.

2. Step 2: Why deque helps in O(1) max retrieval

   Because the deque maintains elements in decreasing order, the maximum is always at the front, allowing quick access without scanning the window.

3. Final Answer:

   To store indices of elements in a way that helps find the maximum in O(1) time per window -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   Deque stores max indices for O(1) max retrieval [OK]

Hint: Deque keeps max at front for quick max retrieval [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Thinking deque stores actual values instead of indices
• Using deque to sort elements
• Using deque to store sums

2. Which of the following is the correct way to declare a deque in C for storing integer indices?

easy

A. struct deque dq; // assuming a deque struct is defined

B. deque<int> dq;

C. int dq[];

D. deque dq = new deque();

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand C data structure declaration

   C does not have built-in deque type; we use structs or arrays to implement it.

2. Step 2: Identify correct syntax

   struct deque dq; // assuming a deque struct is defined shows a struct declaration which is the correct way in C if a deque struct is defined.

3. Final Answer:

   struct deque dq; // assuming a deque struct is defined -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   C uses structs for custom data types [OK]

Hint: Use struct for deque in C, no built-in deque type [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using C++ syntax like deque<int>
• Trying to declare deque like an array without size
• Using Java or other language syntax

3. What is the output of the sliding window maximum for array [2, 1, 3, 4, 6, 3, 8, 9, 10, 12, 56] with window size 4?

medium

A. [3, 4, 6, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 56]

B. [2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12]

C. [4, 6, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 56]

D. [6, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 56]

Solution

1. Step 1: Slide window and find max for each window of size 4

   Windows and max values:
   Window 1: [2,1,3,4] max=4
   Window 2: [1,3,4,6] max=6
   Window 3: [3,4,6,3] max=6
   Window 4: [4,6,3,8] max=8
   Window 5: [6,3,8,9] max=9
   Window 6: [3,8,9,10] max=10
   Window 7: [8,9,10,12] max=12
   Window 8: [9,10,12,56] max=56

2. Step 2: Collect all max values in order

   The max values are [4, 6, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 56]

3. Final Answer:

   [4, 6, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 56] -> Option C

4. Quick Check:

   Max per window = [4,6,6,8,9,10,12,56] [OK]

Hint: Slide window, track max with deque front [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Including partial windows smaller than size 4
• Off-by-one errors in window indexing
• Confusing max values with sums

4. Given this snippet for sliding window maximum, what is the bug?

for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
  while (!dq.empty() && arr[dq.back()] <= arr[i])
    dq.pop_back();
  dq.push_back(i);
  if (dq.front() <= i - k)
    dq.pop_front();
  if (i >= k - 1)
    printf("%d ", arr[dq.front()]);
}

medium

A. The condition to pop front should be < instead of <=

B. No bug, code is correct

C. The condition to pop front should be checked before pushing current index

D. The order of popping from back and pushing is wrong

Solution

1. Step 1: Analyze deque maintenance logic

   The code pops smaller elements from back before pushing current index, ensuring decreasing order.

2. Step 2: Check window boundary condition

   The code pops front if the front index is out of current window (<= i-k), which is correct.

3. Step 3: Confirm output printing

   Printing starts after first full window (i >= k-1), printing max at front index.

4. Final Answer:

   No bug, code is correct -> Option B

5. Quick Check:

   Deque logic and conditions are correct [OK]

Hint: Check deque front removal after pushing current index [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Removing front before pushing current index
• Using wrong comparison operators in conditions
• Printing output before full window

5. How would you modify the sliding window maximum algorithm using deque to find the sliding window minimum instead?

hard

A. Change the comparison from arr[dq.back()] <= arr[i] to arr[dq.back()] >= arr[i] when popping from back

B. Reverse the array before applying the same algorithm

C. Use a stack instead of a deque

D. Change the window size to half

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand max vs min logic in deque

   For max, we pop from back while elements are smaller or equal. For min, we pop while elements are greater or equal.

2. Step 2: Modify comparison operator

   Change condition from arr[dq.back()] <= arr[i] to arr[dq.back()] >= arr[i] to maintain increasing order for min.

3. Final Answer:

   Change the comparison from arr[dq.back()] <= arr[i] to arr[dq.back()] >= arr[i] when popping from back -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Reverse comparison for min sliding window [OK]

Hint: Flip comparison sign to find min instead of max [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Reversing array instead of changing comparison
• Using stack which doesn't maintain order
• Changing window size unnecessarily