Sieve of Eratosthenes Find All Primes in DSA C - Time & Space Complexity

Time Complexity: Sieve of Eratosthenes Find All Primes

O(n log log n)

Understanding Time Complexity

We want to understand how the time needed to find all prime numbers grows as the input number gets bigger.

How does the number of steps change when we increase the limit for primes?

Scenario Under Consideration

Analyze the time complexity of the following code snippet.

void sieve(int n) {
    bool prime[n+1];
    for (int i = 0; i <= n; i++)
        prime[i] = true;
    prime[0] = prime[1] = false;
    for (int p = 2; p * p <= n; p++) {
        if (prime[p]) {
            for (int i = p * p; i <= n; i += p)
                prime[i] = false;
        }
    }
}
    

This code marks all prime numbers up to n by crossing out multiples of each prime.

Identify Repeating Operations

Identify the loops, recursion, array traversals that repeat.

• Primary operation: The inner loop that marks multiples of each prime as not prime.
• How many times: For each prime p, it runs roughly n/p times starting from p*p up to n.

How Execution Grows With Input

As n grows, the number of operations grows a bit faster than n but much less than n squared.

Input Size (n)	Approx. Operations
10	About 20 to 30 steps
100	About 300 to 400 steps
1000	About 4000 to 5000 steps

Pattern observation: The operations grow roughly proportional to n times the logarithm of the logarithm of n, which is slower than n log n but faster than n.

Final Time Complexity

Time Complexity: O(n log log n)

This means the time grows a bit faster than n but much slower than n squared, making it efficient for large n.

Common Mistake

[X] Wrong: "The inner loop runs n times for each number, so the time is O(n²)."

[OK] Correct: The inner loop runs fewer times for larger primes because it starts at p squared and skips multiples, so total work is much less than n squared.

Interview Connect

Understanding this time complexity shows you can analyze nested loops with decreasing work, a useful skill for many algorithm problems.

Self-Check

"What if we started marking multiples from 2*p instead of p*p? How would the time complexity change?"

Practice

1. What is the main purpose of the Sieve of Eratosthenes algorithm?

easy

A. To sort an array of numbers

B. To find all prime numbers up to a given limit

C. To find the greatest common divisor of two numbers

D. To reverse a string

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand the algorithm's goal

   The Sieve of Eratosthenes is designed to identify prime numbers efficiently.

2. Step 2: Recognize the output

   It marks multiples of primes as non-prime to find all primes up to a limit.

3. Final Answer:

   To find all prime numbers up to a given limit -> Option B

4. Quick Check:

   Prime finding = B [OK]

Hint: Sieve marks multiples to find primes fast [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Confusing prime finding with sorting
• Thinking it finds divisors or reverses strings
• Assuming it works for negative numbers

2. Which of the following is the correct way to initialize the sieve array in C for finding primes up to n?

easy

A. int sieve[n+1]; for(int i=0; i<=n; i++) sieve[i] = 1;

B. int sieve[n]; for(int i=1; i

C. int sieve[n+1]; for(int i=0; i<=n; i++) sieve[i] = 0; sieve[0] = sieve[1] = 1;

D. int sieve[n+1]; for(int i=0; i<=n; i++) sieve[i] = i;

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand sieve initialization

   The sieve array uses 1 to mark potential primes initially.

2. Step 2: Check array size and initialization

   Array size should be n+1 to include number n, and all set to 1 (true) initially.

3. Final Answer:

   int sieve[n+1]; for(int i=0; i<=n; i++) sieve[i] = 1; -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Initialize all to 1 for primes [OK]

Hint: Initialize all to 1 (true) for prime candidates [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using size n instead of n+1
• Initializing with zeros instead of ones
• Marking 0 and 1 as prime initially

3. What will be the output of the following C code snippet using Sieve of Eratosthenes to find primes up to 10?

int n = 10;
int sieve[11];
for(int i=0; i<=n; i++) sieve[i] = 1;
sieve[0] = sieve[1] = 0;
for(int i=2; i*i<=n; i++) {
  if(sieve[i]) {
    for(int j=i*i; j<=n; j+=i) sieve[j] = 0;
  }
}
for(int i=2; i<=n; i++) {
  if(sieve[i]) printf("%d ", i);
}

medium

A. 2 3 4 5 7

B. 1 2 3 5 7

C. 2 3 5 7 9

D. 2 3 5 7

Solution

1. Step 1: Initialize sieve and mark 0,1 as non-prime

   Array sieve marks 0 and 1 as 0 (not prime), others as 1 (prime candidate).

2. Step 2: Mark multiples of primes as non-prime

   For i=2, mark 4,6,8,10 as 0; for i=3, mark 9 as 0.

3. Step 3: Print all indices with sieve[i] = 1

   Primes are 2, 3, 5, 7 only.

4. Final Answer:

   2 3 5 7 -> Option D

5. Quick Check:

   Primes up to 10 = 2 3 5 7 [OK]

Hint: Mark multiples starting from i*i to avoid repeats [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Printing 1 as prime
• Including non-primes like 4 or 9
• Starting marking multiples from i instead of i*i

4. Identify the error in this Sieve of Eratosthenes code snippet and choose the correct fix:

int n = 20;
int sieve[21];
for(int i=0; i<=n; i++) sieve[i] = 1;
sieve[0] = sieve[1] = 0;
for(int i=2; i<=n; i++) {
  if(sieve[i]) {
    for(int j=2*i; j<=n; j+=i) sieve[j] = 0;
  }
}

medium

A. Remove sieve[0] and sieve[1] assignments

B. Initialize sieve array with zeros instead of ones

C. Change outer loop condition to i*i <= n

D. Start inner loop from j = i instead of 2*i

Solution

1. Step 1: Analyze outer loop condition

   Outer loop runs from 2 to n, but it should run only up to sqrt(n) for efficiency.

2. Step 2: Understand inner loop start

   Inner loop correctly starts from 2*i, but starting from i*i is more optimal.

3. Step 3: Correct the outer loop condition

   Change outer loop to for(i=2; i*i<=n; i++) to avoid unnecessary iterations.

4. Final Answer:

   Change outer loop condition to i*i <= n -> Option C

5. Quick Check:

   Outer loop till sqrt(n) improves sieve [OK]

Hint: Outer loop runs only to sqrt(n) for marking multiples [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Running outer loop till n wastes time
• Starting inner loop from 2*i instead of i*i (less efficient)
• Not marking 0 and 1 as non-prime

5. You want to find all prime numbers up to 50 using the Sieve of Eratosthenes. After running the sieve, how many numbers will remain marked as prime?

hard

A. 15

B. 16

C. 14

D. 13

Solution

1. Step 1: List primes up to 50

   Primes are: 2,3,5,7,11,13,17,19,23,29,31,37,41,43,47 (total 15).

2. Step 2: Count primes carefully

   Counting again: 2,3,5,7,11,13,17,19,23,29,31,37,41,43,47 = 15 primes.

3. Step 3: Check if 1 is counted

   1 is not prime, so total primes = 15.

4. Final Answer:

   15 -> Option A

5. Quick Check:

   Count primes up to 50 = 15 [OK]

Hint: Count known primes or use sieve output count [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Including 1 as prime
• Miscounting primes between 40 and 50
• Forgetting to exclude non-primes