Bird
Raised Fist0
DSA Cprogramming~5 mins

Push Using Linked List Node in DSA C - Time & Space Complexity

Choose your learning style10 modes available
Time Complexity: Push Using Linked List Node
O(1)
Understanding Time Complexity

We want to understand how long it takes to add a new node at the start of a linked list.

How does the time needed change as the list grows?

Scenario Under Consideration

Analyze the time complexity of the following code snippet.


#include <stdlib.h>

struct Node {
    int data;
    struct Node* next;
};

void push(struct Node** head_ref, int new_data) {
    struct Node* new_node = (struct Node*) malloc(sizeof(struct Node));
    new_node->data = new_data;
    new_node->next = *head_ref;
    *head_ref = new_node;
}
    

This code adds a new node at the beginning of a linked list.

Identify Repeating Operations

Identify the loops, recursion, array traversals that repeat.

  • Primary operation: Creating and linking one new node.
  • How many times: Exactly once per push call, no loops or recursion.
How Execution Grows With Input

Adding a node always takes the same steps regardless of list size.

Input Size (n)Approx. Operations
104 steps (allocate, assign data, link, update head)
1004 steps (same as above)
10004 steps (same as above)

Pattern observation: The number of steps stays the same no matter how big the list is.

Final Time Complexity

Time Complexity: O(1)

This means adding a node at the start takes a fixed amount of time, no matter how long the list is.

Common Mistake

[X] Wrong: "Adding a node takes longer as the list grows because we have to move through the list."

[OK] Correct: We only change the head pointer and link the new node; we never traverse the list for push at the front.

Interview Connect

Knowing that push at the front is quick helps you choose the right data structure for fast insertions.

Self-Check

"What if we changed push to add a node at the end of the linked list? How would the time complexity change?"

Practice

(1/5)
1. What does the push operation do in a linked list when using nodes?
easy
A. Searches for a node with a specific value
B. Adds a new node at the beginning of the list
C. Removes the last node from the list
D. Deletes the entire linked list

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand the push operation

    The push operation adds a new element to the linked list.
  2. Step 2: Identify where the new node is added

    In a linked list, push adds the new node at the start (head) of the list.
  3. Final Answer:

    Adds a new node at the beginning of the list -> Option B
  4. Quick Check:

    Push = Add at head [OK]
Hint: Push always adds at the start of the linked list [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Thinking push adds at the end
  • Confusing push with pop
  • Assuming push deletes nodes
2. Which of the following is the correct syntax to create a new node and push it onto the linked list in C?
easy
A. newNode = malloc(sizeof(Node)); newNode->prev = head; head = newNode;
B. newNode = malloc(Node); newNode->next = head; head = newNode;
C. newNode = malloc(sizeof(Node)); newNode->next = head; head = newNode;
D. newNode = malloc(sizeof(Node)); head = newNode->next; newNode = head;

Solution

  1. Step 1: Allocate memory correctly for new node

    Use malloc(sizeof(Node)) to allocate memory for the new node.
  2. Step 2: Link new node to current head and update head

    Set newNode->next to current head, then update head to newNode.
  3. Final Answer:

    newNode = malloc(sizeof(Node)); newNode->next = head; head = newNode; -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    Correct malloc and linking = newNode = malloc(sizeof(Node)); newNode->next = head; head = newNode; [OK]
Hint: Use sizeof(Node) with malloc and link newNode->next to head [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Forgetting sizeof in malloc
  • Assigning head before setting newNode->next
  • Using prev pointer in singly linked list
3. What will be the linked list after executing the following code?
typedef struct Node {
  int data;
  struct Node* next;
} Node;

Node* head = NULL;

void push(int val) {
  Node* newNode = malloc(sizeof(Node));
  newNode->data = val;
  newNode->next = head;
  head = newNode;
}

push(10);
push(20);
push(30);
medium
A. 30 -> 20 -> 10 -> null
B. 10 -> 20 -> 30 -> null
C. 20 -> 30 -> 10 -> null
D. 10 -> 30 -> 20 -> null

Solution

  1. Step 1: Trace each push call

    push(10) adds 10 at head: 10 -> null; push(20) adds 20 at head: 20 -> 10 -> null; push(30) adds 30 at head: 30 -> 20 -> 10 -> null.
  2. Step 2: Confirm final linked list order

    The last pushed value is at the head, so list is 30 -> 20 -> 10 -> null.
  3. Final Answer:

    30 -> 20 -> 10 -> null -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Last pushed is head = 30 -> 20 -> 10 [OK]
Hint: Last pushed node is always at the head [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Assuming push adds at tail
  • Reading list in wrong order
  • Confusing push with append
4. Identify the error in this push function and select the correct fix:
void push(int val) {
  Node* newNode;
  newNode->data = val;
  newNode->next = head;
  head = newNode;
}
medium
A. head should be assigned before newNode->next
B. newNode->data should be assigned after head update
C. newNode->next should be NULL instead of head
D. newNode is not allocated memory; fix by malloc(sizeof(Node))

Solution

  1. Step 1: Check newNode initialization

    newNode is declared but not allocated memory with malloc, so it points to garbage.
  2. Step 2: Fix by allocating memory

    Use newNode = malloc(sizeof(Node)) before accessing newNode->data or newNode->next.
  3. Final Answer:

    newNode is not allocated memory; fix by malloc(sizeof(Node)) -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    Always malloc before using newNode [OK]
Hint: Always allocate memory before using new node [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using uninitialized pointer
  • Assigning data before allocation
  • Changing head before linking newNode
5. You want to push multiple values 5, 15, 25 onto an empty linked list using the push function below. After pushing, you want to print the list from head to tail. Which code snippet correctly performs this and prints the list?
typedef struct Node {
  int data;
  struct Node* next;
} Node;

Node* head = NULL;

void push(int val) {
  Node* newNode = malloc(sizeof(Node));
  newNode->data = val;
  newNode->next = head;
  head = newNode;
}

// Your code here to push and print
hard
A. push(5); push(15); push(25); Node* temp = head; while(temp) { printf("%d -> ", temp->data); temp = temp->next; } printf("null\n");
B. push(5); push(15); push(25); Node* temp = head; while(temp->next) { printf("%d -> ", temp->data); temp = temp->next; } printf("null\n");
C. push(25); push(15); push(5); Node* temp = head; while(temp) { printf("%d -> ", temp->data); temp = temp->next; } printf("null\n");
D. push(5); push(15); push(25); Node* temp = head; while(temp) { printf("%d ", temp->data); temp = temp->next; }

Solution

  1. Step 1: Push values in correct order

    Push 5, then 15, then 25. Each push adds at head, so list is 25 -> 15 -> 5 -> null.
  2. Step 2: Print all nodes correctly

    Use a loop while(temp) to print each node's data followed by '->', then print 'null' after loop.
  3. Final Answer:

    push(5); push(15); push(25); Node* temp = head; while(temp) { printf("%d -> ", temp->data); temp = temp->next; } printf("null\n"); -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Push order + full print loop = push(5); push(15); push(25); Node* temp = head; while(temp) { printf("%d -> ", temp->data); temp = temp->next; } printf("null\n"); [OK]
Hint: Push in order, print with while(temp) loop ending with null [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Pushing in reverse order
  • Using while(temp->next) and missing last node
  • Not printing 'null' at end
Recommended

Ready to prove it?

Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown strong while earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.

10 questions~5 mineasy hard