Kadane's Algorithm Maximum Subarray in DSA C - Time & Space Complexity

Time Complexity: Kadane's Algorithm Maximum Subarray

O(n)

Understanding Time Complexity

We want to understand how the time taken by Kadane's Algorithm changes as the input array grows.

Specifically, how many steps does it take to find the maximum sum of a continuous subarray?

Scenario Under Consideration

Analyze the time complexity of the following code snippet.

int maxSubArray(int* nums, int numsSize) {
    int maxSoFar = nums[0];
    int currentMax = nums[0];
    for (int i = 1; i < numsSize; i++) {
        currentMax = (nums[i] > currentMax + nums[i]) ? nums[i] : currentMax + nums[i];
        maxSoFar = (maxSoFar > currentMax) ? maxSoFar : currentMax;
    }
    return maxSoFar;
}
    

This code finds the largest sum of any continuous subarray within the input array.

Identify Repeating Operations

Identify the loops, recursion, array traversals that repeat.

• Primary operation: A single for-loop that goes through each element once.
• How many times: Exactly once for each element in the array, so n times.

How Execution Grows With Input

As the array size grows, the number of steps grows directly with it.

Input Size (n)	Approx. Operations
10	About 10 steps
100	About 100 steps
1000	About 1000 steps

Pattern observation: The steps increase in a straight line as input size increases.

Final Time Complexity

Time Complexity: O(n)

This means the time taken grows directly in proportion to the size of the input array.

Common Mistake

[X] Wrong: "Kadane's Algorithm checks all subarrays, so it must be O(n²) or worse."

[OK] Correct: Kadane's cleverly keeps track of sums as it goes, so it only needs one pass through the array, not checking every subarray separately.

Interview Connect

Understanding Kadane's Algorithm time complexity shows you can spot efficient solutions that avoid unnecessary work, a key skill in coding interviews.

Self-Check

"What if we changed the algorithm to check every possible subarray sum by nested loops? How would the time complexity change?"

Practice

1. What does Kadane's Algorithm primarily help to find in an array?

easy

A. The total sum of all elements

B. The minimum element in the array

C. The maximum sum of a contiguous subarray

D. The maximum product of any two elements

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand the problem Kadane's Algorithm solves

   Kadane's Algorithm is designed to find the maximum sum of a contiguous subarray within a one-dimensional array of numbers.

2. Step 2: Compare with other options

   Options B, C, and D describe different problems unrelated to Kadane's Algorithm.

3. Final Answer:

   The maximum sum of a contiguous subarray -> Option C

4. Quick Check:

   Maximum subarray sum = maximum sum of contiguous elements [OK]

Hint: Kadane finds max sum in continuous parts of array [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Confusing max sum with max product
• Thinking it finds minimum element
• Assuming it sums all elements

2. Which of the following is the correct initialization step in Kadane's Algorithm in C?

easy

A. int max_so_far = INT_MIN, max_ending_here = 0;

B. int max_so_far = 0, max_ending_here = 0;

C. int max_so_far = 0, max_ending_here = INT_MIN;

D. int max_so_far = NULL, max_ending_here = 0;

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand initialization in Kadane's Algorithm

   We initialize max_so_far to the smallest integer (INT_MIN) to handle arrays with all negative numbers correctly, and max_ending_here to 0 to start accumulating sums.

2. Step 2: Evaluate each option

   int max_so_far = 0, max_ending_here = 0; initializes max_so_far to 0, which fails for all negative arrays. int max_so_far = 0, max_ending_here = INT_MIN; incorrectly initializes max_ending_here to INT_MIN. int max_so_far = NULL, max_ending_here = 0; uses NULL which is invalid for int.

3. Final Answer:

   int max_so_far = INT_MIN, max_ending_here = 0; -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Use INT_MIN for max_so_far to handle negatives [OK]

Hint: Start max_so_far at INT_MIN to handle negatives [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Initializing max_so_far to 0 causes wrong results
• Using NULL for integer variables
• Swapping initial values of variables

3. What is the output of the following C code using Kadane's Algorithm?

int arr[] = {-2, 3, 2, -1};
int n = 4;
int max_so_far = INT_MIN, max_ending_here = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
    max_ending_here += arr[i];
    if (max_so_far < max_ending_here) max_so_far = max_ending_here;
    if (max_ending_here < 0) max_ending_here = 0;
}
printf("%d", max_so_far);

medium

A. 4

B. 5

C. 3

D. -1

Solution

1. Step 1: Trace the loop and update sums

   Iteration 0: max_ending_here = 0 + (-2) = -2; max_so_far = max(INT_MIN, -2) = -2; max_ending_here < 0, reset to 0.
   Iteration 1: max_ending_here = 0 + 3 = 3; max_so_far = max(-2, 3) = 3; max_ending_here >= 0, no reset.
   Iteration 2: max_ending_here = 3 + 2 = 5; max_so_far = max(3, 5) = 5; max_ending_here >= 0, no reset.
   Iteration 3: max_ending_here = 5 + (-1) = 4; max_so_far = max(5, 4) = 5; max_ending_here >= 0, no reset.

2. Step 2: Final max_so_far value

   After loop ends, max_so_far is 5, which is the maximum subarray sum.

3. Final Answer:

   5 -> Option B

4. Quick Check:

   Max subarray sum = 5 [OK]

Hint: Add elements, reset sum if negative, track max sum [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Not resetting max_ending_here when negative
• Confusing max_so_far with current sum
• Incorrectly summing non-contiguous elements

4. Identify the bug in this Kadane's Algorithm implementation in C:

int maxSubArraySum(int arr[], int n) {
    int max_so_far = 0, max_ending_here = 0;
    for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
        max_ending_here += arr[i];
        if (max_so_far < max_ending_here) max_so_far = max_ending_here;
        if (max_ending_here < 0) max_ending_here = 0;
    }
    return max_so_far;
}

medium

A. max_so_far should be initialized to INT_MIN

B. max_ending_here should be initialized to INT_MIN

C. Loop should start from i = 1

D. Return statement should return max_ending_here

Solution

1. Step 1: Analyze initialization of max_so_far

   Initializing max_so_far to 0 fails when all array elements are negative, as max_so_far will never update to a negative number.

2. Step 2: Correct initialization and effect

   Setting max_so_far to INT_MIN ensures the algorithm correctly finds the maximum subarray sum even if all numbers are negative.

3. Final Answer:

   max_so_far should be initialized to INT_MIN -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Use INT_MIN for max_so_far to handle negative arrays [OK]

Hint: Initialize max_so_far to INT_MIN for negative arrays [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Initializing max_so_far to 0 causes wrong max for negatives
• Changing loop start index unnecessarily
• Returning wrong variable

5. Given an array int arr[] = {-3, -2, -1, -4}, what is the maximum subarray sum using Kadane's Algorithm?

hard

A. -3

B. 0

C. -10

D. -1

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand Kadane's behavior with all negative numbers

   When all numbers are negative, resetting max_ending_here to 0 loses the maximum negative number. Proper Kadane's initialization with max_so_far = INT_MIN helps track the largest negative number.

2. Step 2: Trace the array values

   max_so_far starts at INT_MIN.
   i=0: max_ending_here = -3; max_so_far = -3; reset max_ending_here to 0 since negative.
   i=1: max_ending_here = -2; max_so_far = max(-3, -2) = -2; reset max_ending_here to 0.
   i=2: max_ending_here = -1; max_so_far = max(-2, -1) = -1; reset max_ending_here to 0.
   i=3: max_ending_here = -4; max_so_far = max(-1, -4) = -1; reset max_ending_here to 0.

3. Final Answer:

   -1 -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   Max negative number = -1 [OK]

Hint: Max subarray in negatives is max single element [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Returning 0 instead of max negative
• Not handling all negative arrays
• Assuming sum must be positive