Bird
Raised Fist0
DSA Cprogramming~10 mins

HashMap Implementation from Scratch in DSA C - Interactive Practice

Choose your learning style10 modes available
Practice - 5 Tasks
Answer the questions below
1fill in blank
easy

Complete the code to declare the size of the hash map array.

DSA C
const int TABLE_SIZE = [1];
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
A10
B1
C100
D0
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using zero or one as table size causes no space or too small space.
2fill in blank
medium

Complete the code to compute the hash index for a given key.

DSA C
unsigned int hash(char *key) {
    unsigned int hash = 0;
    for (int i = 0; key[i] != '\0'; i++) {
        hash += key[i];
    }
    return hash [1] TABLE_SIZE;
}
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
A*
B/
C%
D+
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using division (/) can produce indices larger than TABLE_SIZE, causing out-of-bounds access.
3fill in blank
hard

Fix the error in the insert function to correctly add a new key-value pair.

DSA C
void insert(HashMap *map, char *key, int value) {
    unsigned int index = hash(key);
    Entry *new_entry = malloc(sizeof(Entry));
    new_entry->key = key;
    new_entry->value = value;
    new_entry->next = map->table[[1]];
    map->table[index] = new_entry;
}
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Amap
Bvalue
Ckey
Dindex
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using 'value' or 'key' instead of the index causes wrong memory access.
4fill in blank
hard

Fill both blanks to complete the search function that finds a value by key.

DSA C
int search(HashMap *map, char *key) {
    unsigned int index = hash(key);
    Entry *current = map->table[[1]];
    while (current != NULL) {
        if (strcmp(current->key, [2]) == 0) {
            return current->value;
        }
        current = current->next;
    }
    return -1;
}
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Aindex
Bkey
Cmap
Dvalue
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using wrong variables for bucket or key comparison.
5fill in blank
hard

Fill all three blanks to complete the delete function that removes a key from the map.

DSA C
void delete(HashMap *map, char *key) {
    unsigned int index = hash(key);
    Entry *current = map->table[index];
    Entry *prev = NULL;
    while (current != NULL) {
        if (strcmp(current->key, [1]) == 0) {
            if ([2] == NULL) {
                map->table[index] = current->next;
            } else {
                [3]->next = current->next;
            }
            free(current);
            return;
        }
        prev = current;
        current = current->next;
    }
}
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Akey
Bprev
Dcurrent
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using wrong variables for key comparison or pointer updates.

Practice

(1/5)
1. What is the main purpose of a hash function in a HashMap implementation?
easy
A. To sort the keys in ascending order
B. To store values in a linked list
C. To convert a key into an index for storing the value
D. To delete keys from the HashMap

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand the role of a hash function

    A hash function takes a key and converts it into a number (index) that tells where to store the value in the HashMap's internal array.
  2. Step 2: Compare other options

    Sorting keys or deleting keys are not the job of the hash function. Storing values in a linked list is a collision handling method, not hashing.
  3. Final Answer:

    To convert a key into an index for storing the value -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    Hash function = key to index [OK]
Hint: Hash function maps keys to array indexes fast [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Thinking hash function sorts keys
  • Confusing hash function with collision handling
  • Believing hash function deletes keys
2. Which of the following is the correct way to declare a simple HashMap structure in C that stores integer keys and values?
easy
A. typedef struct { int key; int value; } HashNode;
B. typedef struct { char* key; int value; } HashMap;
C. typedef struct { int key; int value; } HashMap;
D. typedef struct { int key; int value; HashNode* next; } HashMap;

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify the basic node structure

    A HashMap stores key-value pairs. A node with int key and int value is a basic unit, so HashNode struct is correct.
  2. Step 2: Check other options

    typedef struct { char* key; int value; } HashMap; uses char* key which is not integer keys. typedef struct { int key; int value; } HashMap; names the struct HashMap but it's actually a node. typedef struct { int key; int value; HashNode* next; } HashMap; adds a pointer for chaining but names it HashMap, which is confusing.
  3. Final Answer:

    typedef struct { int key; int value; } HashNode; -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Node struct with int key and value = typedef struct { int key; int value; } HashNode; [OK]
Hint: Node struct holds key and value pairs [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Confusing node and map struct names
  • Using wrong key types
  • Missing pointer for chaining in basic struct
3. Given the following code snippet for inserting keys into a HashMap with size 5, what will be the index for key 12?
int hash(int key) {
    return key % 5;
}

int index = hash(12);
printf("%d", index);
medium
A. 4
B. 2
C. 3
D. 1

Solution

  1. Step 1: Apply the hash function to key 12

    The hash function returns key % 5. For key 12, 12 % 5 = 2.
  2. Step 2: Confirm the printed index

    The code prints the index, which is 2.
  3. Final Answer:

    2 -> Option B
  4. Quick Check:

    12 % 5 = 2 [OK]
Hint: Modulo operator gives index in hash function [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Calculating 12 % 5 incorrectly
  • Confusing modulo with division
  • Ignoring hash function logic
4. Consider this buggy code snippet for inserting a key-value pair into a HashMap with chaining:
void insert(HashNode** table, int size, int key, int value) {
    int index = key % size;
    HashNode* newNode = malloc(sizeof(HashNode));
    newNode->key = key;
    newNode->value = value;
    newNode->next = NULL;

    if (table[index] == NULL) {
        table[index] = newNode;
    } else {
        table[index]->next = newNode;
    }
}
What is the main problem in this code?
medium
A. It overwrites the existing chain instead of appending correctly
B. It does not handle memory allocation failure
C. It uses wrong hash function
D. It does not set the key and value fields

Solution

  1. Step 1: Analyze insertion logic for chaining

    If the bucket is empty, it sets the new node. Otherwise, it sets table[index]->next = newNode, which overwrites the existing next pointer, losing the chain.
  2. Step 2: Identify correct chaining method

    To append, it should traverse to the last node in the chain and then add the new node, not overwrite the first node's next pointer.
  3. Final Answer:

    It overwrites the existing chain instead of appending correctly -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Chaining requires appending, not overwriting [OK]
Hint: Traverse chain to append new node, don't overwrite next [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Ignoring chain traversal
  • Assuming single node per bucket
  • Not checking for NULL before insertion
5. You want to implement a HashMap from scratch in C that supports integer keys and values, handles collisions using chaining, and dynamically resizes when load factor exceeds 0.7. Which of the following steps is NOT necessary for this implementation?
hard
A. Resize the internal array and rehash all keys when load factor is high
B. Create linked lists at each bucket to handle collisions
C. Implement a hash function to convert keys to indexes
D. Sort the keys in each bucket to speed up search

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand necessary components of HashMap

    A hash function, chaining with linked lists, and resizing with rehashing are all essential for correct and efficient HashMap behavior.
  2. Step 2: Evaluate sorting keys in buckets

    Sorting keys in buckets is not required because chaining uses linked lists and search is done by traversing nodes. Sorting adds unnecessary overhead.
  3. Final Answer:

    Sort the keys in each bucket to speed up search -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    Sorting buckets is unnecessary in chaining [OK]
Hint: Chaining uses linked lists; sorting buckets is extra work [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Thinking sorting improves chaining search
  • Ignoring rehashing on resize
  • Skipping collision handling
Recommended

Ready to prove it?

Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown strong while earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.

10 questions~5 mineasy hard