What is the main goal when deleting a node at the end of a singly linked list?
To remove the last node and update the second last node's next pointer to NULL, effectively shortening the list by one node.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
In a singly linked list, why do we need to traverse the list to delete the last node?
Because singly linked lists do not have backward pointers, we must traverse from the head to find the second last node to update its next pointer.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
What happens if you try to delete the last node in a singly linked list that has only one node?
The head pointer becomes NULL, indicating the list is now empty after deleting the only node.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
Show the key steps in C to delete the last node of a singly linked list.
1. Check if the list is empty (head == NULL). 2. If only one node, free it and set head to NULL. 3. Otherwise, traverse to second last node. 4. Free last node. 5. Set second last node's next to NULL.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
Why is it important to free the memory of the deleted node in C?
To avoid memory leaks by releasing the allocated memory back to the system after the node is no longer used.
Click to reveal answer
What pointer do you update when deleting the last node in a singly linked list?
AThe previous pointer of the last node
BThe head pointer
CThe next pointer of the last node
DThe next pointer of the second last node
✗ Incorrect
You update the next pointer of the second last node to NULL to remove the last node.
If a singly linked list has only one node, what should happen after deleting that node?
AHead pointer should be set to NULL
BHead pointer should point to itself
CNext pointer of the node should be set to NULL
DNothing changes
✗ Incorrect
After deleting the only node, the list becomes empty, so head should be NULL.
Why can't you directly access the second last node in a singly linked list?
ABecause singly linked lists only have next pointers, no backward pointers
BBecause the last node is always the head
CBecause the list is circular
DBecause the second last node is always NULL
✗ Incorrect
Singly linked lists only have next pointers, so you must traverse from head to find the second last node.
What is the time complexity of deleting the last node in a singly linked list?
AO(1)
BO(n)
CO(log n)
DO(n^2)
✗ Incorrect
You must traverse the list to find the second last node, which takes O(n) time.
What happens if you forget to free the deleted node's memory in C?
AThe node is automatically freed
BProgram crashes immediately
CMemory leak occurs
DThe node remains in the list
✗ Incorrect
Not freeing memory causes memory leaks, wasting system resources.
Explain step-by-step how to delete the last node in a singly linked list in C.
Think about what pointers you need to update and when to free memory.
You got /5 concepts.
Describe why deleting the last node in a singly linked list takes O(n) time.
Consider how the list is connected and what information is missing.
You got /4 concepts.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What is the main purpose of the Delete Node at End operation in a singly linked list?
easy
A. To reverse the linked list
B. To add a new node at the end of the linked list
C. To delete the first node of the linked list
D. To remove the last node from the linked list
Solution
Step 1: Understand the operation's goal
The operation aims to remove the last node in the linked list, which is the node that points to null.
Step 2: Identify the correct description
Removing the last node means deleting the node at the end, not adding or reversing nodes.
Final Answer:
To remove the last node from the linked list -> Option D
Quick Check:
Delete Node at End = Remove last node [OK]
Hint: Deleting at end means removing the last node [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Confusing delete at end with delete at beginning
Thinking it adds a node instead of deleting
Mixing up with reversing the list
2. Which of the following C code snippets correctly deletes the last node of a singly linked list named head?
easy
A. if (head == NULL || head->next == NULL) return; Node* temp = head; while (temp->next->next != NULL) temp = temp->next; free(temp->next); temp->next = NULL;
B. Node* temp = head; while (temp->next != NULL) temp = temp->next; free(temp);
C. free(head); head = NULL;
D. Node* temp = head; while (temp->next != NULL) temp = temp->next; temp->next = NULL;
Solution
Step 1: Check for empty or single-node list and traverse to second last node
if (head == NULL || head->next == NULL) return; Node* temp = head; while (temp->next->next != NULL) temp = temp->next; free(temp->next); temp->next = NULL; checks if list is empty or single node, then moves to the node before last using temp->next->next != NULL.
Step 2: Free last node and update pointer
It frees the last node and sets temp->next to NULL, correctly deleting the last node.
Final Answer:
if (head == NULL || head->next == NULL) return; Node* temp = head; while (temp->next->next != NULL) temp = temp->next; free(temp->next); temp->next = NULL; -> Option A
Quick Check:
Traverse to second last, free last, set next NULL = if (head == NULL || head->next == NULL) return; Node* temp = head; while (temp->next->next != NULL) temp = temp->next; free(temp->next); temp->next = NULL; [OK]
Hint: Stop at second last node before deleting last [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Freeing node without updating previous node's next pointer
Not checking for empty list
Freeing head without traversal
3. What will be the output linked list after deleting the last node from the list: 10 -> 20 -> 30 -> 40 -> NULL using the standard delete at end operation?
medium
A. 10 -> 20 -> 30 -> 40 -> NULL
B. 10 -> 20 -> 30 -> NULL
C. 20 -> 30 -> 40 -> NULL
D. 10 -> 20 -> NULL
Solution
Step 1: Identify the last node
The last node is 40, which points to NULL.
Step 2: Remove the last node and update the second last node's next pointer
After deletion, 30 becomes the last node and its next pointer is set to NULL.
A. It does not update the second last node's next pointer to NULL
B. It frees the head node instead of the last node
C. It causes a segmentation fault by accessing NULL pointer
D. It deletes the first node instead of the last
Solution
Step 1: Analyze traversal logic
The loop moves temp to the last node (where temp->next is NULL).
Step 2: Check pointer update after freeing
It frees the last node but does not update the second last node's next pointer to NULL, leaving a dangling pointer.
Final Answer:
It does not update the second last node's next pointer to NULL -> Option A
Quick Check:
Missing next pointer update causes dangling pointer [OK]
Hint: Always update second last node's next to NULL after free [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Freeing node without updating previous node's next
Not handling empty list
Incorrect loop condition causing crash
5. You have a singly linked list with nodes: 5 -> 15 -> 25 -> 35 -> 45 -> NULL. Write the steps to delete the last node and then insert a new node with value 50 at the end. What will be the final list?
hard
A. 5 -> 15 -> 25 -> 35 -> NULL
B. 5 -> 15 -> 25 -> 35 -> 45 -> 50 -> NULL
C. 5 -> 15 -> 25 -> 35 -> 50 -> NULL
D. 50 -> 5 -> 15 -> 25 -> 35 -> NULL
Solution
Step 1: Delete the last node (45)
Traverse to second last node (35), free last node (45), set 35's next to NULL.
Step 2: Insert new node with value 50 at end
Traverse to last node (35), create new node with 50, set 35's next to new node, new node's next to NULL.
Final Answer:
5 -> 15 -> 25 -> 35 -> 50 -> NULL -> Option C
Quick Check:
Delete last, then add 50 at end = 5 -> 15 -> 25 -> 35 -> 50 -> NULL [OK]
Hint: Delete last node, then add new node at end [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Not updating pointers correctly after deletion
Appending new node without deleting last
Inserting new node at wrong position
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.