Bird
Raised Fist0
DSA Cprogramming~30 mins

Count Set Bits Brian Kernighan Algorithm in DSA C - Build from Scratch

Choose your learning style10 modes available
Count Set Bits using Brian Kernighan Algorithm
📖 Scenario: You are working on a simple embedded system that needs to count how many bits are set to 1 in a number. This helps in error detection and data analysis.
🎯 Goal: Build a program that counts the number of set bits (1s) in an integer using the Brian Kernighan algorithm.
📋 What You'll Learn
Create an integer variable named number with the value 29.
Create an integer variable named count initialized to 0.
Use a while loop with the condition number != 0.
Inside the loop, update number using number = number & (number - 1).
Increment count by 1 inside the loop.
Print the value of count after the loop.
💡 Why This Matters
🌍 Real World
Counting set bits is useful in error detection, cryptography, and network data analysis.
💼 Career
Understanding bitwise operations and efficient algorithms is important for embedded systems and low-level programming jobs.
Progress0 / 4 steps
1
Create the initial number variable
Create an integer variable called number and set it to 29.
DSA C
Hint

Use int number = 29; to create the variable.

2
Initialize the count variable
Create an integer variable called count and set it to 0.
DSA C
Hint

Use int count = 0; to start counting from zero.

3
Apply Brian Kernighan's algorithm loop
Use a while loop with the condition number != 0. Inside the loop, update number using number = number & (number - 1) and increment count by 1.
DSA C
Hint

The loop runs until number becomes zero. Each iteration removes the rightmost set bit.

4
Print the count of set bits
Print the value of count using printf with the format "%d\n".
DSA C
Hint

Use printf("%d\n", count); to print the count.

Practice

(1/5)
1. What does the Brian Kernighan algorithm do when counting set bits in a number?
easy
A. It repeatedly clears the least significant set bit until the number becomes zero.
B. It counts the total number of digits in the binary representation.
C. It shifts the number right and counts zeros.
D. It converts the number to decimal and counts digits.

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand the algorithm's main operation

    The algorithm uses n = n & (n-1) to clear the least significant set bit in each iteration.
  2. Step 2: Effect of clearing bits

    Each operation reduces the number of set bits by one until the number becomes zero.
  3. Final Answer:

    It repeatedly clears the least significant set bit until the number becomes zero. -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Clearing bits one by one = It repeatedly clears the least significant set bit until the number becomes zero. [OK]
Hint: Clear least set bit repeatedly to count set bits [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Counting zeros instead of ones
  • Shifting without clearing bits
  • Confusing decimal digits with bits
2. Which of the following is the correct syntax to clear the least significant set bit in C using Brian Kernighan's method?
easy
A. n = n & (n - 1);
B. n = n | (n - 1);
C. n = n & (n + 1);
D. n = n ^ (n - 1);

Solution

  1. Step 1: Recall the bit clearing operation

    The Brian Kernighan algorithm clears the least significant set bit by n = n & (n - 1).
  2. Step 2: Verify other options

    Options A, B, and D do not clear the least significant set bit correctly.
  3. Final Answer:

    n = n & (n - 1); -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Use n & (n-1) to clear bits [OK]
Hint: Use n & (n-1) to clear least set bit [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using +1 instead of -1
  • Using OR or XOR instead of AND
  • Confusing bitwise operators
3. What is the output of the following C code snippet?
unsigned int n = 13; // binary 1101
int count = 0;
while (n) {
  n = n & (n - 1);
  count++;
}
printf("%d", count);
medium
A. 5
B. 2
C. 4
D. 3

Solution

  1. Step 1: Analyze initial value and binary form

    13 in binary is 1101, which has three set bits (1s).
  2. Step 2: Count iterations clearing bits

    Each loop clears one set bit: 1101 -> 1100 -> 1000 -> 0000, so loop runs 3 times.
  3. Final Answer:

    3 -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    Number of set bits in 13 = 3 [OK]
Hint: Count set bits by clearing one bit per loop [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Counting total bits instead of set bits
  • Off-by-one in loop count
  • Misreading binary representation
4. Identify the error in this C code snippet that tries to count set bits using Brian Kernighan's algorithm:
int countSetBits(int n) {
  int count = 0;
  while (n != 0) {
    n = n & (n + 1);
    count++;
  }
  return count;
}
medium
A. Missing initialization of count variable.
B. Using n + 1 instead of n - 1 in bit clearing step.
C. Incorrect return type of the function.
D. Loop condition should be while (n > 0).

Solution

  1. Step 1: Check the bit clearing operation

    The code uses n = n & (n + 1), which does not clear the least significant set bit correctly.
  2. Step 2: Correct operation for clearing bits

    The correct operation is n = n & (n - 1) to clear the least significant set bit.
  3. Final Answer:

    Using n + 1 instead of n - 1 in bit clearing step. -> Option B
  4. Quick Check:

    Use n & (n-1) to clear bits, not n & (n+1) [OK]
Hint: Use n & (n-1) to clear bits, not n & (n+1) [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using +1 instead of -1
  • Ignoring loop condition correctness
  • Forgetting to initialize count
5. Given an array of unsigned integers, which approach using Brian Kernighan's algorithm is most efficient to find the total count of set bits in all elements?
hard
A. Shift each number bit by bit and count set bits using bitwise AND with 1.
B. Convert each number to binary string and count '1's using string functions.
C. For each element, repeatedly clear least significant set bit and count until zero, then sum counts.
D. Use a lookup table for each byte and sum counts for all bytes in each number.

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify Brian Kernighan's approach

    For each element, repeatedly clear least significant set bit and count until zero, then sum counts.: For each element, repeatedly clear the least significant set bit until zero and count (using n = n & (n-1)), then sum the counts across elements. This is the direct application of Brian Kernighan's algorithm.
  2. Step 2: Why it is most efficient using Brian Kernighan

    B (strings) is slow; C (shifts) is O(word size) always; D (lookup) is fast but a separate method, not Brian Kernighan's. Brian Kernighan excels for sparse bits (O(set bits) time).
  3. Final Answer:

    For each element, repeatedly clear least significant set bit and count until zero, then sum counts. -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    Brian Kernighan on array: apply n & (n-1) loop per element [OK]
Hint: Brian Kernighan per element: clear LSB until zero, sum counts [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using string conversion which is slow
  • Bit shifting each bit without optimization
  • Confusing lookup table with Brian Kernighan method
Recommended

Ready to prove it?

Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown strong while earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.

10 questions~5 mineasy hard