Mocking and stubbing in Deno - Performance & Optimization

Performance: Mocking and stubbing

LOW IMPACT

Mocking and stubbing affect test execution speed and resource usage during development but do not impact production page load or rendering.

Testing API calls in Deno without slowing down tests

Deno

import { assertEquals } from "https://deno.land/std/testing/asserts.ts";

Deno.test("mock fetch API", async () => {
  globalThis.fetch = async () => ({
    json: async () => ({ success: true }),
  });
  const response = await fetch("https://api.example.com/data");
  const data = await response.json();
  assertEquals(data.success, true);
});

Mocks fetch to return instant fake data, avoiding network delays.

📈 Performance GainTest runs instantly, no network wait, faster CI feedback

Testing API calls in Deno without slowing down tests

Deno

import { assertEquals } from "https://deno.land/std/testing/asserts.ts";

Deno.test("fetch real API", async () => {
  const response = await fetch("https://api.example.com/data");
  const data = await response.json();
  assertEquals(data.success, true);
});

This test makes a real network request, which is slow and unreliable for testing.

📉 Performance CostBlocks test execution for network latency, slows CI pipelines

Performance Comparison

Pattern	DOM Operations	Reflows	Paint Cost	Verdict
Real network calls in tests	0	0	0	[✗] Bad
Mocked network calls in tests	0	0	0	[✓] Good

Rendering Pipeline

Mocking and stubbing do not affect the browser rendering pipeline since they run in test environments outside the browser.

⚠️ Bottlenecknone

Optimization Tips

1Mock external calls to avoid slow network delays in tests.

2Mocks and stubs do not affect production page rendering performance.

3Use mocks to get fast, reliable test feedback without real side effects.

Performance Quiz - 3 Questions

Why is mocking network calls in tests better for performance?

A It reduces browser reflows during rendering

B It decreases the size of the production bundle

C It avoids slow real network delays during tests

D It improves user interaction responsiveness

DevTools: Performance

How to check: Run tests with and without mocks and measure test duration in the terminal or CI logs.

What to look for: Shorter test run times indicate better performance with mocks.

Practice

1. What is the main purpose of mocking and stubbing in Deno testing?

easy

A. To speed up the execution of the entire program

B. To replace parts of code with fake versions for easier testing

C. To permanently change the behavior of functions in production

D. To automatically generate user interface components

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand mocking and stubbing

   Mocking and stubbing are techniques used to replace parts of code with fake versions to isolate and test specific behaviors.

2. Step 2: Identify the purpose in testing context

   They help test code without relying on real dependencies, making tests simpler and more reliable.

3. Final Answer:

   To replace parts of code with fake versions for easier testing -> Option B

4. Quick Check:

   Mocking purpose = Replace code parts [OK]

Hint: Mocking replaces code parts to isolate tests [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Thinking mocking speeds up the whole program
• Believing mocks change production code permanently
• Confusing mocking with UI generation

2. Which of the following is the correct way to import the stub function from Deno's standard testing library?

easy

A. import { stub } from "https://deno.land/std/testing/stub.ts";

B. import stub from "https://deno.land/std/testing/mock.ts";

C. import { stub } from "https://deno.land/std/testing/mock.ts";

D. import * as stub from "https://deno.land/std/testing/mock.ts";

Solution

1. Step 1: Recall the correct import path and syntax

   The stub function is exported from "https://deno.land/std/testing/mock.ts" and must be imported using named import syntax.

2. Step 2: Check each option

   import { stub } from "https://deno.land/std/testing/mock.ts"; uses named import from the correct path. import stub from "https://deno.land/std/testing/mock.ts"; uses default import which is incorrect. import { stub } from "https://deno.land/std/testing/stub.ts"; uses wrong file name. import * as stub from "https://deno.land/std/testing/mock.ts"; imports all as an object, not the function directly.

3. Final Answer:

   import { stub } from "https://deno.land/std/testing/mock.ts"; -> Option C

4. Quick Check:

   Correct import = named from mock.ts [OK]

Hint: Use named import from mock.ts for stub [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using default import instead of named import
• Wrong file path for stub
• Importing everything instead of just stub

3. Given the following code snippet, what will be the output?

import { stub } from "https://deno.land/std/testing/mock.ts";

const obj = {
  greet() {
    return "Hello";
  }
};

const stubGreet = stub(obj, "greet", () => "Hi there!");
console.log(obj.greet());
stubGreet.restore();
console.log(obj.greet());

medium

A. "Hello" then "Hello"

B. "Hi there!" then "Hi there!"

C. Runtime error due to incorrect stub usage

D. "Hi there!" then "Hello"

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand stub behavior on method

   The stub replaces obj.greet with a new function returning "Hi there!" temporarily.

2. Step 2: Analyze console outputs

   First console.log calls stubbed method, outputting "Hi there!". After restore(), original method returns "Hello" on second log.

3. Final Answer:

   "Hi there!" then "Hello" -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   Stub replaces then restores method [OK]

Hint: Stub changes method until restore is called [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Expecting original method output before restore
• Thinking stub permanently changes method
• Confusing stub with spy that tracks calls

4. What is the error in the following Deno test code using stub?

import { stub } from "https://deno.land/std/testing/mock.ts";

const obj = {
  value() {
    return 42;
  }
};

const stubValue = stub(obj, "val", () => 100);
console.log(obj.value());
stubValue.restore();

medium

A. Trying to stub a non-existent method 'val' on obj

B. Missing import statement for stub

C. restore() called before stub is created

D. Incorrect arrow function syntax in stub

Solution

1. Step 1: Check stub target method name

   The stub tries to replace method named "val" but obj only has "value" method.

2. Step 2: Understand stub behavior on invalid method

   Stubbing a non-existent method causes an error or does not work as expected.

3. Final Answer:

   Trying to stub a non-existent method 'val' on obj -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Stub method must exist on object [OK]

Hint: Stub only existing methods on objects [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using wrong method name in stub
• Forgetting to import stub
• Calling restore too early

5. You want to test a function that calls fetchData() which normally fetches data from the internet. Using Deno's stub, how can you replace fetchData to return a fixed value { success: true } only during the test, and ensure the original fetchData is restored after the test?

hard

A. Use const stubFetch = stub(obj, "fetchData", () => ({ success: true })); then call stubFetch.restore() after test

B. Replace fetchData globally without restore, returning fixed value

C. Use stub(obj, "fetchData", async () => Promise.resolve({ success: true })); but forget to restore

D. Call stub(obj, "fetchData", () => { return true; }); without storing stub

Solution

1. Step 1: Create a stub for fetchData returning fixed value

   Use stub on the object containing fetchData, replacing it with a function returning { success: true }.

2. Step 2: Restore original method after test

   Store the stub in a variable and call restore() after the test to revert changes.

3. Final Answer:

   Use const stubFetch = stub(obj, "fetchData", () => ({ success: true })); then call stubFetch.restore() after test -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Stub with restore keeps tests clean [OK]

Hint: Always restore stub after test to keep original code [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Not restoring stub after test
• Replacing globally without control
• Returning wrong stub value type