Group-based ownership helps teams share responsibility for data models. It makes managing and updating data easier and clearer.
Group-based ownership in dbt
version: 2
models:
- name: model_name
owners:
- group: data_engineering
- group: analytics_teamThe owners field lists groups responsible for the model.
Groups are defined by your organization's access control system.
sales_team group as owners of the sales_summary model.version: 2
models:
- name: sales_summary
owners:
- group: sales_teamanalytics_team and data_engineering groups share ownership of the user_activity model.version: 2
models:
- name: user_activity
owners:
- group: analytics_team
- group: data_engineeringThis example shows a model named customer_orders owned by two groups: sales_team and data_engineering. This means both teams share responsibility for this model.
version: 2 models: - name: customer_orders description: "Aggregated customer orders data" owners: - group: sales_team - group: data_engineering
Group ownership helps with clear responsibility but does not replace individual accountability.
Make sure groups are well defined in your organization's access control system.
Group-based ownership assigns responsibility to teams, not just individuals.
This improves collaboration and clarity in data projects.
Use the owners field in your dbt model configuration to set group owners.
Practice
Solution
Step 1: Understand group-based ownership purpose
Group-based ownership means assigning responsibility to a team, not just one person.Step 2: Identify the benefit in collaboration
This improves teamwork and clarity on who manages data models.Final Answer:
It assigns responsibility to teams instead of just individuals. -> Option BQuick Check:
Group ownership = team responsibility [OK]
- Thinking it fixes data automatically
- Confusing ownership with performance
- Assuming it removes documentation needs
Solution
Step 1: Recall dbt model ownership syntax
dbt uses theownersfield as a list to assign group owners.Step 2: Match correct syntax
The correct syntax isowners: ['group_name'], which matches owners: ['data_team'].Final Answer:
owners: ['data_team'] -> Option AQuick Check:
Use owners list for groups [OK]
- Using owner instead of owners
- Using groups or team_owner fields which don't exist
- Assigning a string instead of a list
models:
- name: sales_summary
owners: ['analytics_team', 'data_engineers']Which groups are responsible for the
sales_summary model?Solution
Step 1: Read the owners list in config
The owners field lists two groups: 'analytics_team' and 'data_engineers'.Step 2: Understand group ownership assignment
Both groups share responsibility for the model.Final Answer:
Both analytics_team and data_engineers -> Option CQuick Check:
Multiple owners = multiple groups responsible [OK]
- Choosing only one group when multiple are listed
- Ignoring the owners field
- Assuming no groups if multiple owners exist
models:
- name: customer_data
owners: 'marketing_team'Solution
Step 1: Check owners field type
The owners field must be a list of strings, but here it is a single string.Step 2: Confirm correct syntax
Correct syntax uses square brackets: owners: ['marketing_team'].Final Answer:
owners should be a list, not a string -> Option DQuick Check:
owners must be a list [OK]
- Using a string instead of a list
- Misspelling owners field
- Ignoring YAML syntax rules
Solution
Step 1: Confirm correct field name and type
The field must beownersand a list of group names.Step 2: Check options for correct syntax
owners: ['data_science', 'qa_team'] usesowners: ['data_science', 'qa_team'], which is correct.Step 3: Understand notification implication
Assigning multiple owners ensures both groups are responsible and notified.Final Answer:
owners: ['data_science', 'qa_team'] -> Option AQuick Check:
Multiple owners list = multiple groups notified [OK]
- Using a string with commas instead of a list
- Using owner instead of owners
- Using groups field which is invalid
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown
