We store test failures to understand what went wrong in our data. This helps us fix problems and keep data trustworthy.
Store test failures for analysis in dbt
config( store_failures = true ) select * from {{ ref('your_model') }}
Use store_failures = true inside the config() block of your test.
This tells dbt to save the rows that fail the test into a table for later analysis.
customers model.version: 2
models:
- name: customers
tests:
- unique:
config:
store_failures: trueorder_id values and stores failing rows.select * from {{ ref('orders') }} where order_id is null -- config to store failures {{ config( store_failures=true ) }}
This test finds rows in the orders table where order_id is missing. Because store_failures=true, dbt saves these rows in a separate table for review.
-- In your dbt test file (e.g., tests/not_null_order_id.sql)
{{ config(
severity='error',
store_failures=true
) }}
select * from {{ ref('orders') }}
where order_id is nullStored failure tables are created in your target schema with a prefix like dbt_test.
Remember to clean up old failure tables if you run many tests to save space.
Failure tables help you see exactly which data rows caused the test to fail.
Use store_failures=true in your test config to save failing rows.
Stored failures help analyze and fix data quality issues.
Failure tables are saved in your database for easy access and review.
Practice
store_failures = true in a dbt test configuration do?Solution
Step 1: Understand the purpose of
This setting controls whether dbt saves the rows that fail a test.store_failuresStep 2: Identify the effect of setting it to true
When set to true, dbt stores failing rows in a table for analysis.Final Answer:
It saves the rows that fail the test for later analysis. -> Option DQuick Check:
store_failures = true means save failing rows [OK]
- Thinking it skips tests instead of saving failures
- Assuming it deletes data on failure
- Confusing it with notification settings
Solution
Step 1: Recall dbt config syntax
dbt uses Python-like syntax with keyword arguments insideconfig().Step 2: Identify the correct assignment
The correct syntax uses equals sign and boolean true without quotes.Final Answer:
config(store_failures = true) -> Option CQuick Check:
Use equals and boolean true without quotes [OK]
- Using colon instead of equals sign
- Using double equals (==) instead of single equals
- Putting true in quotes making it a string
store_failures = true, which SQL query will show the failing rows for a model named orders and test unique?Solution
Step 1: Recall naming convention for failure tables
dbt stores failures in tables nameddbt_test__model__test.Step 2: Apply model and test names
For model 'orders' and test 'unique', the table isdbt_test__orders__unique.Final Answer:
SELECT * FROM dbt_test__orders__unique -> Option AQuick Check:
Failure table = dbt_test__model__test [OK]
- Assuming failure data is in original model table
- Using incorrect table prefixes
- Trying to filter failures in source tables
store_failures = true in your test config, but after running tests, no failure tables appear. What is the most likely cause?Solution
Step 1: Understand when failure tables are created
Failure tables are only created if the test finds failing rows.Step 2: Check if test found failures
If no failures, no failure table is generated.Final Answer:
The test did not find any failing rows, so no failure table was created. -> Option AQuick Check:
No failures means no failure table [OK]
- Thinking failure tables must be pre-created
- Assuming store_failures only works for some test types
- Looking in wrong schema without verifying failures
customers model. Which approach best helps you combine all failure data for analysis?Solution
Step 1: Identify failure tables for each test
Each test creates a failure table nameddbt_test__customers__testname.Step 2: Combine failure tables using SQL UNION
Use a UNION query to combine all failure rows from these tables into one result set.Final Answer:
Create a union query combining all dbt_test__customers__* failure tables. -> Option BQuick Check:
Union failure tables to analyze all failures together [OK]
- Disabling store_failures loses failure data
- Merging outside database is inefficient
- Filtering original table misses failure details
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown
