Bird
Raised Fist0
Data Structures Theoryknowledge~10 mins

Heapify operation in Data Structures Theory - Interactive Code Practice

Choose your learning style10 modes available

Start learning this pattern below

Jump into concepts and practice - no test required

or
Recommended
Test this pattern10 questions across easy, medium, and hard to know if this pattern is strong
Practice - 5 Tasks
Answer the questions below
1fill in blank
easy

Complete the code to identify the parent index in a heap array.

Data Structures Theory
parent_index = (child_index - 1) [1] 2
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
A//
B+
C*
D-
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using normal division '/' which gives a float.
Using addition or multiplication instead of division.
2fill in blank
medium

Complete the code to find the left child index in a heap array.

Data Structures Theory
left_child_index = [1] * 2 + 1
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Anode
Bchild_index
Cindex
Dparent_index
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using child_index instead of parent_index.
Forgetting to add 1 after multiplication.
3fill in blank
hard

Fix the error in the heapify function to correctly swap elements when the child is greater than the parent.

Data Structures Theory
if heap[[1]] > heap[parent]:
    heap[[1]], heap[parent] = heap[parent], heap[[1]]
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Aindex
Bparent
Cchild
Droot
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using parent index instead of child index for comparison.
Swapping the wrong elements.
4fill in blank
hard

Fill both blanks to complete the heapify condition that checks if the left child exists and is greater than the parent.

Data Structures Theory
if [1] < len(heap) and heap[[2]] > heap[parent]:
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Aleft_child_index
Bright_child_index
Dparent
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using right_child_index instead of left_child_index.
Comparing with parent index instead of child index.
5fill in blank
hard

Fill all three blanks to complete the dictionary comprehension that maps each node to its heapified value if it is greater than zero.

Data Structures Theory
heapified = [1]: [2] for [1], [2] in enumerate(heap) if [2] > 0}
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Aindex
Bvalue
Dnode
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using the same variable name for both index and value.
Not matching variable names consistently.

Practice

(1/5)
1. What is the main purpose of the heapify operation in a heap data structure?
easy
A. To fix the heap property at a given node by comparing and swapping with its children
B. To insert a new element at the end of the heap
C. To delete the root element of the heap
D. To sort all elements in the heap in ascending order

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand the heap property

    The heap property requires that each parent node is ordered with respect to its children (max-heap or min-heap).
  2. Step 2: Role of heapify

    Heapify fixes the heap property at a specific node by comparing it with its children and swapping if needed to maintain the heap structure.
  3. Final Answer:

    To fix the heap property at a given node by comparing and swapping with its children -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Heapify fixes heap property locally = A [OK]
Hint: Heapify fixes heap property at one node only [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Confusing heapify with insertion or deletion
  • Thinking heapify sorts the entire heap
  • Assuming heapify adds or removes elements
2. Which of the following is the correct way to call heapify on a node at index i in an array arr representing a heap of size n?
easy
A. heapify(arr, i)
B. heapify(i, arr, n)
C. heapify(n, i, arr)
D. heapify(arr, n, i)

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand heapify parameters

    Heapify usually takes the array, the size of the heap, and the index of the node to fix.
  2. Step 2: Match correct parameter order

    The common order is heapify(array, size, index), so heapify(arr, n, i) is correct.
  3. Final Answer:

    heapify(arr, n, i) -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    heapify(arr, size, index) = D [OK]
Hint: Remember heapify(arr, size, index) parameter order [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Mixing order of parameters
  • Omitting the size parameter
  • Passing index before array
3. Given the array [3, 9, 2, 1, 4, 5] representing a binary heap, what will be the array after calling heapify(arr, 6, 0) assuming a max-heap?
medium
A. [9, 4, 2, 1, 3, 5]
B. [9, 3, 5, 1, 4, 2]
C. [5, 9, 3, 1, 4, 2]
D. [3, 9, 2, 1, 4, 5]

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify children of node at index 0

    Index 0 has children at indices 1 (9) and 2 (2).
  2. Step 2: Compare and swap to maintain max-heap

    9 is largest child, swap 3 and 9. Now at index 1, check children 3 and 4; 4 is largest, swap 3 and 4. Resulting array: [9, 4, 2, 1, 3, 5].
  3. Step 3: Verify heap property

    After swaps, the array is [9, 4, 2, 1, 3, 5]. However, the [9, 3, 5, 1, 4, 2] is [9, 3, 5, 1, 4, 2], which is incorrect because 5 is at index 2, which is less than 9 but greater than 2.
  4. Correction:

    Actually, the correct heapify result is [9, 4, 5, 1, 3, 2]. But this option is not present. Let's simulate carefully:
  5. Start: [3,9,2,1,4,5]
  6. Swap 3 and 9: [9,3,2,1,4,5]
  7. Now heapify at index 1:
  8. Children: index 3 (1), index 4 (4)
  9. Largest child is 4 at index 4, swap 3 and 4: [9,4,2,1,3,5]
  10. Heapify at index 4: children indices 9 and 10 (out of range), stop.
  11. Final array: [9,4,2,1,3,5]
  12. This matches [9, 4, 2, 1, 3, 5].
  13. Final Answer:

    [9, 4, 2, 1, 3, 5] -> Option A
  14. Quick Check:

    Heapify swaps to max child = B [OK]
Hint: Swap with largest child repeatedly for max-heap [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Swapping with wrong child
  • Not continuing heapify after first swap
  • Confusing min-heap with max-heap
4. Consider this code snippet for heapify on a max-heap:
def heapify(arr, n, i):
    largest = i
    left = 2*i + 1
    right = 2*i + 2
    if left < n and arr[left] > arr[largest]:
        largest = left
    if right < n and arr[right] > arr[largest]:
        largest = right
    if largest != i:
        arr[i], arr[largest] = arr[largest], arr[i]
        heapify(arr, n, largest)

What is the error if the recursive call is missing?
medium
A. The array will be sorted incorrectly
B. Heap property may not be fixed completely below the swapped node
C. The function will cause infinite recursion
D. No error, heapify works fine without recursion

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand heapify recursion role

    After swapping, heapify must fix the subtree rooted at the swapped child.
  2. Step 2: Effect of missing recursion

    Without recursive call, only the current node is fixed; subtree below may violate heap property.
  3. Final Answer:

    Heap property may not be fixed completely below the swapped node -> Option B
  4. Quick Check:

    Missing recursion breaks full heap fix = C [OK]
Hint: Always recurse after swap to fix subtree [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Assuming one swap fixes entire heap
  • Thinking recursion causes infinite loop
  • Ignoring subtree violations
5. You have an unsorted array [4, 10, 3, 5, 1]. To build a max-heap using heapify, which index should you start heapifying from and why?
hard
A. Index 4, because heapify starts from the last element
B. Index 0, because heapify must start from the root
C. Index 1, because heapify starts from the last non-leaf node upwards
D. Index 2, because heapify starts from the middle element

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify last non-leaf node

    For array size 5, last non-leaf node is at index floor(n/2)-1 = 1.
  2. Step 2: Reason heapify build process

    Heapify is applied from last non-leaf node upwards to root to build heap efficiently.
  3. Final Answer:

    Index 1, because heapify starts from the last non-leaf node upwards -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    Build heap starts at last non-leaf node = A [OK]
Hint: Start heapify at last non-leaf node (floor(n/2)-1) [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Starting heapify at root only
  • Starting at last element (leaf)
  • Not knowing leaf vs non-leaf nodes