Consider a Binary Search Tree (BST). Why is it important to keep the tree balanced?
Think about how the height of the tree affects the time it takes to find a value.
Balancing a BST keeps its height low, which means operations like search, insert, and delete can be done quickly, typically in O(log n) time. An unbalanced tree can degrade to a linked list with O(n) time.
What is the maximum height of a balanced Binary Search Tree containing n nodes?
Balanced trees aim for the smallest possible height relative to the number of nodes.
A balanced BST has height proportional to log2(n), which ensures efficient operations.
After inserting a new node into a BST, the tree becomes unbalanced. The imbalance occurs when a node's left child's right subtree is taller than its left subtree. What type of imbalance is this?
Think about which subtree of the left child is causing the imbalance.
When the left child's right subtree is taller, it is a Left-Right (LR) imbalance, which requires a double rotation to fix.
Which statement correctly compares AVL trees and Red-Black trees regarding balancing?
Consider how strict the balancing rules are and how that affects operation speeds.
AVL trees maintain a stricter balance, which makes searches faster but insertions and deletions slower due to more rotations. Red-Black trees allow more imbalance, making insertions and deletions faster but searches slightly slower.
Given a BST that becomes unbalanced after inserting a node causing a Right-Left (RL) imbalance at a certain node, how many rotations are needed to restore balance?
Think about the standard fix for RL imbalance in AVL trees.
For a Right-Left imbalance, the fix is a double rotation: first a left rotation on the right child, then a right rotation on the unbalanced node.