Memory-efficient operations in Data Analysis Python - Mini Project: Build & Apply

Memory-efficient Operations in Data Analysis

📖 Scenario: You work as a data analyst for a small company. You have a list of daily sales numbers for a month. You want to calculate the total sales but want to do it in a way that uses less memory.

🎯 Goal: Build a small program that sums daily sales using a memory-efficient method.

📋 What You'll Learn

Create a list of daily sales numbers

Create a variable to hold the total sales

Use a memory-efficient loop to sum the sales

Print the total sales

💡 Why This Matters

🌍 Real World

Summing daily sales is a common task in business to understand total revenue.

💼 Career

Data analysts often need to process large lists of numbers efficiently to save memory and speed up calculations.

1

Create the daily sales list

Create a list called daily_sales with these exact values: 120, 150, 100, 130, 160, 170, 180.

Data Analysis Python

# Create the list daily_sales with the exact values
# Your code here

Hint

Use square brackets and separate numbers with commas.

2

Create a total sales variable

Create a variable called total_sales and set it to 0 to hold the sum of sales.

Data Analysis Python

daily_sales = [120, 150, 100, 130, 160, 170, 180]
# Create total_sales variable and set it to 0
# Your code here

Hint

Use an equals sign to assign 0 to total_sales.

3

Sum sales using a memory-efficient loop

Use a for loop with the variable sale to iterate over daily_sales and add each sale to total_sales.

Data Analysis Python

daily_sales = [120, 150, 100, 130, 160, 170, 180]
total_sales = 0
# Use a for loop to add each sale to total_sales
# Your code here

Hint

Use for sale in daily_sales: and inside the loop add sale to total_sales.

4

Print the total sales

Write a print statement to display the value of total_sales.

Data Analysis Python

daily_sales = [120, 150, 100, 130, 160, 170, 180]
total_sales = 0
for sale in daily_sales:
    total_sales += sale
# Print the total_sales value
# Your code here

Hint

Use print(total_sales) to show the sum.

Practice

1. Which of the following is a common method to reduce memory usage when working with large datasets in Python?

easy

A. Increase the size of integer columns to 64-bit

B. Use print statements to debug data

C. Convert text columns to 'category' data type

D. Load the entire dataset into memory at once

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand memory usage of data types

   Text columns with repeated values use more memory as strings than as categories.

2. Step 2: Apply category conversion

   Converting text columns to 'category' type stores unique values once, saving memory.

3. Final Answer:

   Convert text columns to 'category' data type -> Option C

4. Quick Check:

   Category type reduces memory for repeated text [OK]

Hint: Convert repeated text columns to 'category' type to save memory [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Thinking increasing integer size saves memory
• Loading full dataset without chunking
• Using print for memory optimization

2. Which of the following is the correct syntax to read a large CSV file in chunks of 1000 rows using pandas?

easy

A. pd.read_csv('file.csv', chunksize=1000)

B. pd.read_csv('file.csv', chunk=1000)

C. pd.read_csv('file.csv', size=1000)

D. pd.read_csv('file.csv', batch=1000)

Solution

1. Step 1: Recall pandas chunk reading parameter

   The correct parameter to read in chunks is 'chunksize'.

2. Step 2: Match syntax

   Only pd.read_csv('file.csv', chunksize=1000) uses 'chunksize=1000', which is correct syntax.

3. Final Answer:

   pd.read_csv('file.csv', chunksize=1000) -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   chunksize=1000 reads file in 1000-row chunks [OK]

Hint: Use 'chunksize' parameter to read CSV in parts [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using 'chunk' instead of 'chunksize'
• Using 'size' or 'batch' which are invalid
• Forgetting to specify chunk size

3. What will be the output of the following code snippet?

import pandas as pd
import numpy as np

df = pd.DataFrame({
    'A': np.random.randint(0, 100, 5),
    'B': ['cat', 'dog', 'cat', 'dog', 'cat']
})
df['B'] = df['B'].astype('category')
print(df.memory_usage(deep=True))

medium

A. Raises a TypeError due to invalid astype conversion

B. Prints the DataFrame instead of memory usage

C. Shows memory usage with 'B' column using more memory than object type

D. Shows memory usage with 'B' column using less memory than object type

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand astype('category') effect

   Converting column 'B' to category reduces memory by storing unique values once.

2. Step 2: Interpret memory_usage(deep=True)

   This method shows memory used by each column including actual string data size.

3. Final Answer:

   Shows memory usage with 'B' column using less memory than object type -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   Category type reduces memory usage [OK]

Hint: astype('category') lowers memory for repeated text columns [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Expecting error from astype conversion
• Thinking category uses more memory
• Confusing print output with DataFrame display

4. Identify the error in the following code that attempts to reduce memory usage:

import pandas as pd

df = pd.read_csv('data.csv')
df['col'] = df['col'].astype('category')
df = df.astype({'num_col': 'int8'})
print(df.memory_usage())

medium

A. Using 'int8' may cause overflow if values exceed range

B. memory_usage() does not show memory savings

C. astype cannot convert columns after reading CSV

D. No error; code correctly reduces memory usage

Solution

1. Step 1: Check int8 range suitability

   int8 supports values from -128 to 127; larger values cause overflow.

2. Step 2: Identify potential overflow risk

   If 'num_col' has values outside int8 range, conversion causes incorrect data.

3. Final Answer:

   Using 'int8' may cause overflow if values exceed range -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   int8 range limits can cause data errors [OK]

Hint: Check numeric ranges before downcasting to smaller types [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Assuming all int conversions are safe
• Believing memory_usage() ignores changes
• Thinking astype fails after CSV read

5. You have a large dataset with a column 'status' containing only three unique string values repeated many times. Which memory-efficient approach is best to reduce memory usage and why? Options: A) Drop the 'status' column to save memory. B) Convert 'status' to string type and keep numeric columns as float64. C) Convert 'status' to category type and downcast numeric columns to smallest possible integer type. D) Convert all columns to object type for flexibility.

hard

A. Drop the 'status' column to save memory.

B. Convert 'status' to category type and downcast numeric columns to smallest possible integer type.

C. Convert 'status' to string type and keep numeric columns as float64.

D. Convert all columns to object type for flexibility.

Solution

1. Step 1: Use category for repeated strings

   Converting 'status' to category stores unique values once, saving memory.

2. Step 2: Downcast numeric columns

   Downcasting numeric columns to smallest integer type reduces memory without losing data.

3. Step 3: Evaluate other options

   Keeping strings as object or dropping columns wastes memory or data; object type uses more memory.

4. Final Answer:

   Convert 'status' to category type and downcast numeric columns to smallest possible integer type. -> Option B

5. Quick Check:

   Category + downcast = best memory saving [OK]

Hint: Use category for repeated strings and downcast numbers [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Dropping useful columns unnecessarily
• Keeping strings as object wastes memory
• Converting all to object increases memory