Bird
Raised Fist0
Computer Visionml~10 mins

Evaluation and confusion matrix in Computer Vision - Interactive Code Practice

Choose your learning style10 modes available

Start learning this pattern below

Jump into concepts and practice - no test required

or
Recommended
Test this pattern10 questions across easy, medium, and hard to know if this pattern is strong
Practice - 5 Tasks
Answer the questions below
1fill in blank
easy

Complete the code to import the function that computes the confusion matrix.

Computer Vision
from sklearn.metrics import [1]
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Atrain_test_split
Bconfusion_matrix
Cclassification_report
Daccuracy_score
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Importing accuracy_score instead of confusion_matrix
Importing train_test_split which is for splitting data
2fill in blank
medium

Complete the code to calculate accuracy from true and predicted labels.

Computer Vision
accuracy = sum(y_true == y_pred) / [1]
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Alen(y_pred)
Bsum(y_pred)
Clen(y_true)
Dsum(y_true)
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Dividing by sum of predictions instead of total samples
Using length of predictions which might differ if data is inconsistent
3fill in blank
hard

Fix the error in the code to correctly compute the confusion matrix.

Computer Vision
cm = confusion_matrix([1], y_pred)
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Apredictions
By_pred
Clabels
Dy_true
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Swapping true and predicted labels
Passing undefined variable names
4fill in blank
hard

Fill both blanks to create a dictionary comprehension that counts true positives for each class.

Computer Vision
true_positives = {cls: sum((y_true == cls) & ([1] == cls)) for cls in [2]
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Ay_pred
By_true
Cclasses
Dlabels
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using y_true instead of y_pred in the condition
Using undefined variable names for classes
5fill in blank
hard

Fill all three blanks to compute precision for each class from the confusion matrix.

Computer Vision
precision = {j: cm[[1], [2]] / sum(cm[:, [3]]) for j in classes}
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Ai
Bj
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Mixing row and column indices
Dividing by sum over rows instead of columns

Practice

(1/5)
1. What does a confusion matrix help you understand in a classification model?
easy
A. The speed of the model during training
B. How well the model predicts each class by showing true and false predictions
C. The number of layers in the model
D. The size of the input images

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand the purpose of a confusion matrix

    A confusion matrix shows counts of correct and incorrect predictions for each class, helping evaluate classification performance.
  2. Step 2: Match the description to the options

    Only How well the model predicts each class by showing true and false predictions describes this purpose correctly, while others relate to unrelated model aspects.
  3. Final Answer:

    How well the model predicts each class by showing true and false predictions -> Option B
  4. Quick Check:

    Confusion matrix = True/False predictions summary [OK]
Hint: Confusion matrix shows correct vs wrong class predictions [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Confusing confusion matrix with model speed
  • Thinking it shows model architecture details
  • Assuming it shows input data size
2. Which of the following is the correct way to create a confusion matrix using scikit-learn in Python?
easy
A. confusion_matrix(y_pred)
B. confusionMatrix(y_true, y_pred)
C. conf_matrix(y_pred, y_true)
D. confusion_matrix(y_true, y_pred)

Solution

  1. Step 1: Recall the scikit-learn function signature

    The function to create a confusion matrix is confusion_matrix(y_true, y_pred) with true labels first, then predicted labels.
  2. Step 2: Check each option for correctness

    confusion_matrix(y_true, y_pred) matches the correct function and argument order. Options B, C, and D have wrong names or argument orders.
  3. Final Answer:

    confusion_matrix(y_true, y_pred) -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    Correct function name and argument order [OK]
Hint: Use exact function name and order: confusion_matrix(true, pred) [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using wrong function name capitalization
  • Swapping true and predicted labels
  • Passing only one argument
3. Given the following code, what will be the output confusion matrix?
from sklearn.metrics import confusion_matrix

y_true = [0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1]
y_pred = [0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1]

cm = confusion_matrix(y_true, y_pred)
print(cm)
medium
A. [[3 0] [1 3]]
B. [[2 1] [0 4]]
C. [[3 1] [0 3]]
D. [[4 0] [1 2]]

Solution

  1. Step 1: Count true positives and negatives

    Class 0 true positives: y_true=0 and y_pred=0 occur 3 times; false negatives: y_true=1 but y_pred=0 occur once.
  2. Step 2: Build confusion matrix

    Matrix rows = true labels, columns = predicted labels. So cm = [[3,0],[1,3]] matches counts.
  3. Final Answer:

    [[3 0] [1 3]] -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Count matches matrix entries [OK]
Hint: Count true/pred pairs carefully to fill matrix [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Mixing rows and columns order
  • Counting predicted labels as true labels
  • Ignoring zero counts
4. You wrote this code but got an error:
from sklearn.metrics import confusion_matrix

cm = confusion_matrix(y_pred, y_true)
print(cm)
What is the likely cause of the error?
medium
A. Using print instead of return
B. Missing import statement for confusion_matrix
C. Swapped y_pred and y_true arguments causing shape mismatch
D. y_pred and y_true are not defined variables

Solution

  1. Step 1: Check argument order for confusion_matrix

    The function expects y_true first, then y_pred. Swapping them can cause errors or wrong results.
  2. Step 2: Analyze the error cause

    Since import is present and print is valid, the likely cause is swapped arguments causing shape or value errors.
  3. Final Answer:

    Swapped y_pred and y_true arguments causing shape mismatch -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    Correct argument order is true labels first [OK]
Hint: Always pass true labels first, predicted second [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Swapping true and predicted labels
  • Forgetting to import confusion_matrix
  • Using undefined variables
5. You have a 3-class image classifier with classes A, B, and C. The confusion matrix is:
[[5 2 0]
 [1 7 1]
 [0 2 6]]
What is the precision for class B?
hard
A. 7 / (2 + 7 + 2) = 0.58
B. 7 / (1 + 7 + 1) = 0.7
C. 7 / (5 + 1 + 0) = 0.7
D. 7 / (7 + 1 + 2) = 0.58

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify precision formula for class B

    Precision = True Positives for B / (All predicted as B). True Positives = cm[1][1] = 7.
  2. Step 2: Calculate total predicted as B

    Sum column 1: cm[0][1]=2 + cm[1][1]=7 + cm[2][1]=2 = 11. So precision = 7/11 ≈ 0.636, closest to 0.58 in 7 / (2 + 7 + 2) = 0.58.
  3. Final Answer:

    7 / (2 + 7 + 2) = 0.58 -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Precision = TP / predicted positives [OK]
Hint: Precision = TP / sum of predicted class column [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using row sums instead of column sums
  • Confusing precision with recall
  • Ignoring off-diagonal values in predicted class column