In a stop-and-wait flow control protocol, what happens immediately after the sender transmits a data frame?
Think about how the sender ensures the receiver got the data before continuing.
In stop-and-wait, the sender sends one frame and waits for an acknowledgment before sending the next. This prevents overwhelming the receiver.
What is the main advantage of using a sliding window protocol with a window size greater than one?
Consider how sending multiple frames without waiting affects data flow.
A sliding window with size greater than one lets the sender send several frames before needing acknowledgments, improving efficiency and throughput.
Given a network with a high round-trip time (RTT), which sliding window size will maximize utilization without causing buffer overflow at the receiver?
Think about how the bandwidth-delay product relates to data in transit.
The bandwidth-delay product represents the amount of data that can fill the network pipe. Setting the window size to this value maximizes utilization without overflow.
Which statement correctly compares stop-and-wait and sliding window flow control protocols?
Focus on how many frames each protocol sends before waiting.
Stop-and-wait sends one frame and waits for acknowledgment before sending the next. Sliding window allows multiple frames to be sent before waiting.
In a sliding window protocol, if an acknowledgment for a frame is lost but the frame was received correctly, what is the most likely outcome?
Consider how the sender detects lost acknowledgments and what it does next.
If an acknowledgment is lost, the sender assumes the frame was not received and retransmits it. The receiver may get a duplicate but can detect and discard it.