Bird
Raised Fist0
Compiler Designknowledge~10 mins

Left recursion elimination in Compiler Design - Interactive Code Practice

Choose your learning style10 modes available
Practice - 5 Tasks
Answer the questions below
1fill in blank
easy

Complete the code to identify if a grammar rule is left recursive.

Compiler Design
if production.startswith([1]):
    print("Left recursion detected")
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Aepsilon
Bterminal
Cnon_terminal
Ddigit
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Confusing terminal with non-terminal symbols.
2fill in blank
medium

Complete the code to remove immediate left recursion from a grammar rule.

Compiler Design
A -> A [1] | beta
Rewrite as:
A -> beta A'
A' -> [2] A' | epsilon
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Aalpha
Bbeta
Cepsilon
Dgamma
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Mixing up alpha and beta parts.
3fill in blank
hard

Fix the error in the code that eliminates left recursion.

Compiler Design
while productions and productions[0].startswith([1]):
    left_recursive.append(productions.pop(0))
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Aterminal
Bnon_terminal
Cbeta
Dalpha
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Checking for terminal or beta instead of non-terminal.
4fill in blank
hard

Fill both blanks to correctly rewrite a left recursive grammar rule.

Compiler Design
A -> [1] A'
A' -> [2] A' | epsilon
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Abeta
Balpha
Cgamma
Ddelta
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Swapping alpha and beta parts.
5fill in blank
hard

Fill all three blanks to complete the dictionary comprehension that eliminates left recursion.

Compiler Design
new_productions = { [1]: [2] for [3] in productions if not [3].startswith(non_terminal) }
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Aprod
Bproductions[prod]
Dnon_terminal
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using inconsistent variable names or wrong filtering condition.

Practice

(1/5)
1. What is the main reason to eliminate left recursion in a grammar?
easy
A. To simplify bottom-up parsing
B. To make the grammar ambiguous
C. To increase the number of production rules
D. To prevent infinite loops in top-down parsers

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand left recursion impact

    Left recursion causes a parser to repeatedly call the same rule without consuming input, leading to infinite loops in top-down parsers.
  2. Step 2: Identify the goal of elimination

    Eliminating left recursion removes this infinite loop problem, making the grammar usable for top-down parsing methods like recursive descent.
  3. Final Answer:

    To prevent infinite loops in top-down parsers -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    Left recursion causes infinite loops = Prevent infinite loops [OK]
Hint: Left recursion causes infinite loops; remove it for top-down parsing [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Thinking left recursion improves parsing speed
  • Confusing left recursion with ambiguity
  • Believing bottom-up parsers require left recursion elimination
2. Which of the following is the correct way to start eliminating immediate left recursion from a rule A -> A α | β?
easy
A. Rewrite as A -> β A' and A' -> α A' | ε
B. Rewrite as A -> α A | β
C. Rewrite as A -> β | α A' and A' -> ε
D. Rewrite as A -> A' β and A' -> α | ε

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify immediate left recursion pattern

    The rule A -> A α | β has immediate left recursion because A appears on the left side of its own production.
  2. Step 2: Apply standard elimination method

    Rewrite as A -> β A' and A' -> α A' | ε to remove left recursion by introducing a new non-terminal A'.
  3. Final Answer:

    Rewrite as A -> β A' and A' -> α A' | ε -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Immediate left recursion elimination uses new non-terminal A' [OK]
Hint: Use new non-terminal and right recursion to remove immediate left recursion [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Not introducing a new non-terminal
  • Swapping α and β incorrectly
  • Leaving left recursion in the rewritten rules
3. Given the grammar rule E -> E + T | T, after eliminating left recursion, what is the correct equivalent set of productions?
medium
A. E -> T E'
E' -> + T E' | ε
B. E -> E' + T
E' -> T | ε
C. E -> T + E'
E' -> T | ε
D. E -> T | E' + T
E' -> + T | ε

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify left recursion in E -> E + T | T

    The rule is immediately left recursive because E appears on the left side of its own production.
  2. Step 2: Apply left recursion elimination formula

    Rewrite as E -> T E' and E' -> + T E' | ε where E' is a new non-terminal handling the recursion on the right side.
  3. Final Answer:

    E -> T E' and E' -> + T E' | ε -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Left recursion removed by new non-terminal E' [OK]
Hint: Rewrite left recursion as right recursion with new non-terminal [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Placing '+' before T incorrectly
  • Not adding epsilon (ε) to new rule
  • Mixing order of productions
4. Consider the grammar rule S -> S a | b. Which of the following corrected versions properly eliminates left recursion?
medium
A. S -> S' b
S' -> a | ε
B. S -> b | a S'
S' -> S | ε
C. S -> b S'
S' -> a S' | ε
D. S -> b a S'
S' -> S | ε

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify immediate left recursion in S -> S a | b

    The rule is left recursive because S appears on the left side of its own production.
  2. Step 2: Rewrite to remove left recursion

    Rewrite as S -> b S' and S' -> a S' | ε introducing new non-terminal S' to handle recursion on the right side.
  3. Final Answer:

    S -> b S' and S' -> a S' | ε -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    Left recursion removed by new non-terminal S' [OK]
Hint: New non-terminal after base case removes left recursion [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Placing recursion on the left side again
  • Not including epsilon (ε) in new rule
  • Swapping terminals and non-terminals incorrectly
5. Given the indirect left recursion in the grammar:
A -> B a | c
B -> A b | d
Which of the following is the correct first step to eliminate left recursion?
hard
A. Remove B from the grammar
B. Substitute B in A's productions to get immediate left recursion
C. Replace B with d in all rules
D. Directly rewrite A as A -> c A' and A' -> a A' | ε

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify indirect left recursion

    Here, A calls B and B calls A, causing indirect left recursion.
  2. Step 2: Substitute B's productions into A

    Replace B in A -> B a | c with A b | d to get A -> A b a | d a | c, creating immediate left recursion.
  3. Step 3: Eliminate immediate left recursion

    Now apply immediate left recursion elimination on A.
  4. Final Answer:

    Substitute B in A's productions to get immediate left recursion -> Option B
  5. Quick Check:

    Indirect recursion -> substitution -> immediate recursion [OK]
Hint: Convert indirect to immediate recursion by substitution first [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Trying to eliminate without substitution
  • Removing non-terminals incorrectly
  • Ignoring indirect recursion
Recommended

Ready to prove it?

Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown strong while earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.

10 questions~5 mineasy hard