UserInfouint8 age, bool isMember, and uint8 levelsetUserInfo to set all three variablesgetUserInfo that returns all three variablesJump into concepts and practice - no test required
UserInfouint8 age, bool isMember, and uint8 levelsetUserInfo to set all three variablesgetUserInfo that returns all three variablesUserInfo. Inside it, declare three state variables in this order: uint8 age, bool isMember, and uint8 level. This order helps Solidity pack them into one storage slot.Declare the variables in the order: uint8 age, then bool isMember, then uint8 level to enable packing.
UserInfo contract, write a public function named setUserInfo that takes three parameters: uint8 _age, bool _isMember, and uint8 _level. Assign these parameters to the state variables age, isMember, and level respectively.Define a public function setUserInfo with three parameters and assign them to the state variables.
UserInfo contract, write a public view function named getUserInfo that returns three values: uint8 for age, bool for isMember, and uint8 for level. Return the state variables in the order age, isMember, level.Define a public view function getUserInfo that returns the three state variables in order.
testUserInfo that calls setUserInfo with age = 30, isMember = true, and level = 5, then calls getUserInfo and returns the results.Create a function testUserInfo that sets values and returns them to verify packing works.
What is the main benefit of variable packing in blockchain smart contracts?
Which of the following Solidity variable declarations best uses variable packing?
uint8 a; uint16 b; uint32 c;
uint8 a; uint16 b; uint32 c; in this order. orders variables from uint8 (smallest) to uint32 (largest), maximizing packing.Consider this Solidity struct packed into one storage slot:
struct Data {
uint8 x;
uint16 y;
uint8 z;
}
Data d = Data(1, 300, 2);What is the total storage size used by d?
Identify the error in this Solidity contract snippet related to variable packing:
contract Example {
uint256 a;
uint8 b;
uint16 c;
}Why is this not optimized for variable packing?
You want to store these variables in a Solidity contract efficiently:
bool isActive; uint8 count; uint256 total; uint16 code;
Which variable order best uses variable packing to minimize storage slots?
bool isActive; uint8 count; uint16 code; uint256 total; lists variables in this order, maximizing packing into fewer storage slots.