0
0
Azurecloud~10 mins

ARM vs Bicep vs Terraform decision in Azure - Visual Side-by-Side Comparison

Choose your learning style9 modes available
Process Flow - ARM vs Bicep vs Terraform decision
Start: Need to deploy Azure infrastructure
Choose tool: ARM, Bicep, or Terraform?
ARM Template
Write JSON
Deploy via Azure
Infrastructure created in Azure
End
This flow shows the decision process for choosing ARM, Bicep, or Terraform to deploy Azure infrastructure, and how each tool works to create resources.
Execution Sample
Azure
resource storageAccount 'Microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts@2021-04-01' = {
  name: 'mystorage'
  location: 'eastus'
  kind: 'StorageV2'
  sku: {
    name: 'Standard_LRS'
  }
}
This Bicep code defines a storage account resource in Azure with basic properties.
Process Table
StepToolActionInputOutputNotes
1DecisionChoose deployment toolNeed Azure infraSelect ARM, Bicep, or TerraformStart of process
2ARMWrite JSON templateJSON syntaxARM template fileManual JSON, verbose
3BicepWrite Bicep codeSimpler syntaxBicep fileEasier than ARM JSON
4BicepCompile BicepBicep fileARM JSON templateBicep compiles to ARM
5TerraformWrite HCL codeTerraform syntaxTerraform config filesMulti-cloud support
6ARM/BicepDeploy templateARM JSON templateAzure resources createdUses Azure native deployment
7TerraformRun terraform applyTerraform configAzure resources createdTerraform manages state
8EndInfrastructure readyDeployed resourcesResources available in AzureDeployment complete
💡 Infrastructure deployed successfully using chosen tool
Status Tracker
VariableStartAfter Step 2After Step 4After Step 6Final
Template CodeNoneARM JSON template createdARM JSON template from BicepARM JSON deployedResources deployed
Bicep CodeNoneNoneBicep code writtenCompiled to ARM JSONARM JSON deployed
Terraform ConfigNoneNoneNoneTerraform config writtenResources deployed
Key Moments - 3 Insights
Why do we need to compile Bicep code before deployment?
Because Azure only understands ARM JSON templates, Bicep code must be converted to ARM JSON before deployment, as shown in execution_table step 4.
Can Terraform deploy resources outside Azure?
Yes, Terraform supports multiple clouds, unlike ARM and Bicep which are Azure-specific, as noted in execution_table step 5.
Why is ARM template considered verbose compared to Bicep?
ARM templates use JSON which is more detailed and harder to write, while Bicep uses simpler syntax that compiles to ARM JSON, shown in steps 2 and 3.
Visual Quiz - 3 Questions
Test your understanding
Look at the execution_table, at which step does Bicep code get converted to ARM JSON?
AStep 3
BStep 4
CStep 5
DStep 6
💡 Hint
Check the 'Action' column for 'Compile Bicep' in execution_table row 4
According to variable_tracker, which variable changes after Step 4?
ATemplate Code
BTerraform Config
CBicep Code
DNone
💡 Hint
Look at 'Template Code' row and its value after Step 4 in variable_tracker
If you want to manage infrastructure across multiple clouds, which tool is best based on execution_table?
AARM
BBicep
CTerraform
DNone
💡 Hint
See notes in execution_table step 5 about multi-cloud support
Concept Snapshot
ARM, Bicep, and Terraform are tools to deploy Azure infrastructure.
ARM uses JSON templates, which are verbose.
Bicep is simpler syntax that compiles to ARM JSON.
Terraform uses HCL and supports multiple clouds.
Choose based on complexity, multi-cloud needs, and ease of use.
Full Transcript
This visual execution shows how to decide between ARM, Bicep, and Terraform for deploying Azure infrastructure. First, you pick a tool. ARM requires writing JSON templates directly. Bicep lets you write simpler code that compiles into ARM JSON. Terraform uses its own language and can manage resources across clouds. The execution table traces each step from writing code to deploying resources. Variable tracking shows how code changes form and get deployed. Key moments clarify why Bicep compiles to ARM and Terraform's multi-cloud ability. The quiz tests understanding of these steps and tool differences.