REST API vs HTTP API in AWS API Gateway: Key Differences and Usage
REST API supports advanced features like API keys, usage plans, and caching, while HTTP API offers a simpler, faster, and cheaper option with basic routing and JWT authorizers. Choose REST API for complex, feature-rich APIs and HTTP API for low-latency, cost-effective HTTP services.Quick Comparison
This table summarizes the main differences between REST API and HTTP API in AWS API Gateway.
| Feature | REST API | HTTP API |
|---|---|---|
| Protocol Support | RESTful APIs with full HTTP methods | Simplified HTTP APIs with common methods |
| Latency | Higher latency due to feature richness | Lower latency, optimized for speed |
| Cost | Higher cost per million requests | Lower cost, more budget-friendly |
| Authentication | Supports IAM, Lambda authorizers, Cognito, API keys | Supports JWT authorizers, Lambda authorizers, and IAM |
| Caching | Built-in response caching available | No built-in caching |
| Use Cases | Complex APIs needing fine control and features | Simple APIs needing fast, low-cost routing |
Key Differences
REST API in API Gateway is designed for full-featured RESTful services. It supports advanced features like request/response transformations, API keys, usage plans, and caching. This makes it ideal when you need fine-grained control over your API behavior and security.
On the other hand, HTTP API is a newer, lightweight option focused on simplicity and performance. It supports common HTTP methods, JWT authorizers, and Lambda authorizers but lacks some advanced features like request transformations and caching. This results in lower latency and cost, making it great for simple APIs or microservices.
While REST API supports multiple authentication methods including Lambda authorizers and API keys, HTTP API currently supports JWT authorizers, Lambda authorizers, and IAM only. Also, REST API has built-in caching to improve performance, which HTTP API does not provide.
Code Comparison
Here is an example of creating a simple GET endpoint using REST API in AWS CloudFormation.
Resources:
MyRestApi:
Type: AWS::ApiGateway::RestApi
Properties:
Name: MyRestApi
MyResource:
Type: AWS::ApiGateway::Resource
Properties:
ParentId: !GetAtt MyRestApi.RootResourceId
PathPart: hello
RestApiId: !Ref MyRestApi
MyMethod:
Type: AWS::ApiGateway::Method
Properties:
HttpMethod: GET
ResourceId: !Ref MyResource
RestApiId: !Ref MyRestApi
AuthorizationType: NONE
Integration:
Type: MOCK
RequestTemplates:
application/json: '{"statusCode": 200}'HTTP API Equivalent
Here is the equivalent simple GET endpoint using HTTP API in AWS CloudFormation.
Resources:
MyHttpApi:
Type: AWS::ApiGatewayV2::Api
Properties:
Name: MyHttpApi
ProtocolType: HTTP
MyIntegration:
Type: AWS::ApiGatewayV2::Integration
Properties:
ApiId: !Ref MyHttpApi
IntegrationType: MOCK
IntegrationMethod: GET
PayloadFormatVersion: '1.0'
MyRoute:
Type: AWS::ApiGatewayV2::Route
Properties:
ApiId: !Ref MyHttpApi
RouteKey: GET /hello
Target: !Join ["/integrations/", [!Ref MyIntegration]]When to Use Which
Choose REST API when you need advanced features like API keys, usage plans, request/response transformations, or caching. It is best for complex APIs requiring fine control and multiple authentication methods.
Choose HTTP API when you want a simple, fast, and cost-effective API with basic routing and JWT, Lambda, or IAM authentication. It is ideal for microservices, low-latency applications, or when you want to minimize cost and complexity.