Hint: ECS commands manage containers, Lambda uses different syntax [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Thinking this command deploys Lambda functions
Confusing S3 bucket commands with ECS
Assuming CloudFormation syntax
3. You have a web app that needs to run continuously with custom OS settings. Which AWS option fits best? Options: A) AWS Lambda B) AWS CloudFront C) Amazon S3 D) Amazon ECS with Fargate
medium
A. AWS Lambda
B. AWS CloudFront
C. Amazon S3
D. Amazon ECS with Fargate
Solution
Step 1: Identify app requirements
The app runs continuously and needs custom OS settings, so it needs control over environment.
Step 2: Match service to requirements
AWS Lambda is event-driven and short-lived, not continuous. ECS with Fargate runs containers continuously with environment control.
Final Answer:
Amazon ECS with Fargate -> Option D
Quick Check:
Continuous app + custom OS = ECS Fargate [OK]
Hint: Continuous with custom OS? Choose containers (ECS) not Lambda [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Choosing Lambda for continuous workloads
Confusing S3 (storage) or CloudFront (CDN) as compute
Ignoring environment control needs
4. You tried running a container on AWS Lambda but it failed. What is the likely cause?
medium
A. Lambda does not support running containers longer than 15 minutes
B. Lambda requires a Dockerfile to deploy containers
C. Lambda only supports Python code, not containers
D. Lambda cannot run containers at all
Solution
Step 1: Understand Lambda container support
Lambda supports container images but has a max execution time of 15 minutes.
Step 2: Identify cause of failure
If container runs longer than 15 minutes, Lambda will fail the execution.
Final Answer:
Lambda does not support running containers longer than 15 minutes -> Option A
Quick Check:
Lambda container max time = 15 minutes [OK]
Hint: Lambda containers have 15-minute max runtime limit [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Thinking Lambda cannot run containers at all
Believing Lambda only supports Python code
Confusing Dockerfile requirement
5. Your startup wants to minimize costs and avoid managing servers for a new app with unpredictable traffic spikes. Which AWS approach is best?
hard
A. Deploy on AWS Lambda for automatic scaling and no server management
B. Use Amazon ECS with EC2 instances for full control
C. Host on Amazon EC2 with manual scaling
D. Use AWS Elastic Beanstalk with fixed server capacity
Solution
Step 1: Analyze startup needs
Startup wants to minimize costs and avoid managing servers, with unpredictable traffic.
Step 2: Match AWS service to needs
AWS Lambda automatically scales with traffic and requires no server management, reducing cost and effort.
Step 3: Compare other options
ECS with EC2 or Elastic Beanstalk requires server management or fixed capacity, increasing cost and complexity.
Final Answer:
Deploy on AWS Lambda for automatic scaling and no server management -> Option A
Quick Check:
Min cost + no servers + spikes = Lambda [OK]
Hint: No servers + spikes? Pick Lambda for auto scaling [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Choosing ECS or EC2 which need server management
Assuming Elastic Beanstalk auto-scales without servers
Ignoring cost and management factors
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.