Which statement correctly describes the relationship between AWS Regions and Availability Zones (AZs)?
Think about how AWS separates its data centers to improve fault tolerance.
AWS Regions are geographic areas that contain multiple isolated Availability Zones. Each AZ is a separate data center designed to be independent to avoid single points of failure.
You want to design a web application that remains available even if one Availability Zone fails. Which AWS infrastructure setup best supports this requirement?
Consider how AWS AZs provide fault isolation within a Region.
Deploying across multiple AZs in the same Region ensures that if one AZ fails, the application remains available in the other AZs.
You have users primarily in Europe and want to minimize latency while complying with data residency laws. Which AWS Region choice best meets these needs?
Think about geographic proximity and legal requirements.
Choosing a Region physically located in Europe reduces latency for European users and helps comply with data residency regulations.
What is a key security consideration when deploying applications across multiple AWS Regions?
Think about how AWS Regions are isolated from each other.
Each AWS Region is isolated, so compliance and data protection policies must be managed per Region to meet local laws and security requirements.
You want to optimize your AWS deployment for cost while maintaining resilience. Which strategy best balances these goals?
Consider cost of cross-Region replication and fault tolerance.
Deploying across multiple AZs in one Region provides resilience with lower cost than multi-Region active-active setups. Backups to another Region add disaster recovery without continuous replication costs.