Consider an Astro page with multiple islands using different frameworks. What happens when you specify client:load on a React island?
<AstroIsland client:load> <ReactComponent /> </AstroIsland>
Think about what client:load means for hydration timing.
client:load tells Astro to hydrate the component as soon as the page loads, making it interactive immediately.
Which option shows the correct way to import and use a Vue component as an island in an Astro page?
Remember the common hydration directives in Astro.
client:load is a valid hydration directive that hydrates the component immediately after page load. All options import correctly, but only option A uses a valid hydration directive syntax.
You have two islands on the same Astro page: a React island and a Svelte island. You want to share a counter state between them. What is the expected behavior if you update the counter in the React island?
Think about how islands are designed to work independently.
Astro islands are isolated components. They do not share state automatically. To share state, you must use external state management or URL params.
Given this Astro island code, why does the component fail to hydrate on the client?
import Counter from '../components/Counter.jsx';
Check how the component is used in the Astro file.
Simply importing and placing a component with client:load is not enough. The component must be used inside an Astro component or island wrapper to hydrate properly.
You want to build an Astro page with multiple islands. One island needs fast initial load and minimal JavaScript. Another island requires complex state management and many user interactions. Which frameworks should you choose for each island to optimize performance and developer experience?
Consider which frameworks are known for minimal runtime and which excel at complex state.
Solid.js compiles to minimal JavaScript and hydrates quickly, ideal for fast-loading islands. React has mature state management and ecosystem, suitable for complex interactive islands.