Bird
Raised Fist0
Android Kotlinmobile~10 mins

ViewModel creation in Android Kotlin - Interactive Code Practice

Choose your learning style10 modes available
Practice - 5 Tasks
Answer the questions below
1fill in blank
easy

Complete the code to create a ViewModel class named MyViewModel.

Android Kotlin
class MyViewModel : [1]() {
}
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
AViewModel
BActivity
CFragment
DApplication
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Extending Activity or Fragment instead of ViewModel.
Forgetting to extend any class.
2fill in blank
medium

Complete the code to get a ViewModel instance inside an Activity.

Android Kotlin
val viewModel = ViewModelProvider(this).[1](MyViewModel::class.java)
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Abuild
Bget
Ccreate
DnewInstance
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using create() or newInstance() which do not exist in ViewModelProvider.
Forgetting to pass the ViewModel class.
3fill in blank
hard

Fix the error in the ViewModel class declaration to use the correct import for ViewModel.

Android Kotlin
import androidx.lifecycle.[1]

class MyViewModel : ViewModel() {
}
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
ALifecycleOwner
BViewModelProvider
CViewModel
DLiveData
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Importing ViewModelProvider instead of ViewModel.
Importing unrelated lifecycle classes.
4fill in blank
hard

Fill both blanks to create a ViewModel with a factory inside a Fragment.

Android Kotlin
val viewModel = ViewModelProvider(this, [1]()).[2](MyViewModel::class.java)
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
AMyViewModelFactory
Bget
Ccreate
DViewModelProviderFactory
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using create() instead of get().
Passing wrong factory class.
5fill in blank
hard

Fill all three blanks to create a ViewModel with saved state support inside an Activity.

Android Kotlin
val viewModel = ViewModelProvider(this, [1](application, [2])).[3](MyViewModel::class.java)
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
ASavedStateViewModelFactory
BsavedStateRegistryOwner
Cget
DViewModelStoreOwner
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using wrong factory class.
Forgetting to pass savedStateRegistryOwner.
Using create() instead of get().

Practice

(1/5)
1. What is the main purpose of a ViewModel in Android development?
easy
A. To define the layout of the app screen
B. To handle user input events directly
C. To store and manage UI-related data in a lifecycle conscious way
D. To manage network requests

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand ViewModel role

    A ViewModel is designed to hold UI data safely during configuration changes like screen rotations.
  2. Step 2: Compare options

    Only To store and manage UI-related data in a lifecycle conscious way describes this purpose correctly; others describe unrelated tasks.
  3. Final Answer:

    To store and manage UI-related data in a lifecycle conscious way -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    ViewModel purpose = store UI data safely [OK]
Hint: ViewModel holds UI data safely during screen changes [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Confusing ViewModel with UI layout classes
  • Thinking ViewModel handles user input directly
  • Assuming ViewModel manages network calls
2. Which of the following is the correct way to declare a ViewModel class in Kotlin?
easy
A. class MyViewModel extends ViewModel {}
B. class MyViewModel : ViewModel() {}
C. fun MyViewModel() : ViewModel {}
D. val MyViewModel = ViewModel()

Solution

  1. Step 1: Recall Kotlin class syntax

    Kotlin uses a colon (:) to extend a class and parentheses for constructor calls.
  2. Step 2: Check each option

    class MyViewModel : ViewModel() {} uses correct Kotlin syntax for extending ViewModel; others use Java syntax or invalid declarations.
  3. Final Answer:

    class MyViewModel : ViewModel() {} -> Option B
  4. Quick Check:

    Kotlin inheritance uses ':' and parentheses [OK]
Hint: Use ':' to extend class in Kotlin, not 'extends' [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using Java syntax 'extends' in Kotlin
  • Declaring ViewModel as a function
  • Assigning ViewModel to a val without class
3. Given this ViewModel code snippet, what will be the output when counter.value is printed after increment() is called twice?
class CounterViewModel : ViewModel() {
  val counter = MutableLiveData(0)
  fun increment() {
    counter.value = (counter.value ?: 0) + 1
  }
}
medium
A. 2
B. 1
C. null
D. 0

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand initial value and increment

    counter starts at 0; each increment adds 1 to current value.
  2. Step 2: Calculate after two increments

    After first call: 0 + 1 = 1; after second call: 1 + 1 = 2.
  3. Final Answer:

    2 -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Two increments from 0 = 2 [OK]
Hint: Each increment adds 1; two calls add 2 total [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Forgetting to unwrap nullable value
  • Assuming counter resets each time
  • Confusing LiveData with normal variable
4. Identify the error in this ViewModel code:
class SampleViewModel : ViewModel() {
  val data = MutableLiveData<String>()

  fun updateData(newData: String) {
    data.value = newData
  }

  fun getData(): String {
    return data.value
  }
}
medium
A. ViewModel class must be abstract
B. MutableLiveData cannot hold String values
C. updateData() should not modify LiveData value
D. getData() returns nullable String but declared as non-nullable

Solution

  1. Step 1: Check LiveData type and usage

    MutableLiveData<String> can hold String values; updateData() correctly sets value.
  2. Step 2: Analyze getData() return type

    data.value is nullable String?, but getData() returns non-nullable String, causing a type mismatch.
  3. Final Answer:

    getData() returns nullable String but declared as non-nullable -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    LiveData value is nullable; return type must match [OK]
Hint: LiveData.value is nullable; match return types carefully [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Ignoring nullable type of LiveData.value
  • Thinking ViewModel must be abstract
  • Believing LiveData can't hold String
5. You want to create a ViewModel that holds a list of user names and updates the UI reactively. Which is the best way to declare and update this list inside your ViewModel?
hard
A. class UserViewModel : ViewModel() {\n val users = MutableLiveData(emptyList())\n fun addUser(name: String) {\n users.value = users.value?.plus(name)\n }\n}
B. class UserViewModel : ViewModel() {\n val users = mutableListOf<String>()\n fun addUser(name: String) {\n users.add(name)\n }\n}
C. class UserViewModel : ViewModel() {\n var users = listOf<String>()\n fun addUser(name: String) {\n users += name\n }\n}
D. class UserViewModel : ViewModel() {\n val users = LiveData()\n fun addUser(name: String) {\n users.value = listOf(name)\n }\n}

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify reactive data holder

    MutableLiveData<List<String>> allows UI to observe changes and update reactively.
  2. Step 2: Check update method correctness

    class UserViewModel : ViewModel() {\n val users = MutableLiveData<List<String>>(emptyList())\n fun addUser(name: String) {\n users.value = users.value?.plus(name)\n }\n} uses users.value?.plus(name) to add a user immutably and update LiveData, which is correct.
  3. Step 3: Review other options

    class UserViewModel : ViewModel() {\n val users = mutableListOf<String>()\n fun addUser(name: String) {\n users.add(name)\n }\n} uses mutableList but not LiveData, so UI won't update reactively. class UserViewModel : ViewModel() {\n var users = listOf<String>()\n fun addUser(name: String) {\n users += name\n }\n} uses var list but no LiveData. class UserViewModel : ViewModel() {\n val users = LiveData<List<String>>()\n fun addUser(name: String) {\n users.value = listOf(name)\n }\n} tries to instantiate LiveData directly, which is abstract and invalid.
  4. Final Answer:

    class UserViewModel : ViewModel() {\n val users = MutableLiveData<List<String>>(emptyList())\n fun addUser(name: String) {\n users.value = users.value?.plus(name)\n }\n} -> Option A
  5. Quick Check:

    Use MutableLiveData with immutable updates for reactive UI [OK]
Hint: Use MutableLiveData and update list immutably for UI updates [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using mutableList without LiveData for UI data
  • Trying to instantiate LiveData directly
  • Modifying list without updating LiveData value
Recommended

Ready to prove it?

Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown strong while earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.

10 questions~5 mineasy hard