Bird
Raised Fist0

Which approach fundamentally changes compared to the original Meeting Rooms I problem?

hard🎤 Interviewer Follow-up Q10 of Q15
Intervals - Meeting Rooms I
Suppose meetings can be attended multiple times if they do not overlap, and you want to find the maximum number of meetings a person can attend (including repeats). Which approach fundamentally changes compared to the original Meeting Rooms I problem?
AUse the same sorting and overlap check approach as Meeting Rooms I
BSort intervals by end time and greedily select non-overlapping meetings
CUse interval scheduling with dynamic programming to count maximum attendable meetings
DApply brute force checking all pairs repeatedly
Step-by-Step Solution
Solution:
  1. Step 1: Understand problem variant

    Allowing multiple attendance and maximizing count requires selecting intervals, not just overlap detection.
  2. Step 2: Apply greedy interval scheduling

    Sorting by end time and greedily selecting earliest finishing meetings maximizes count.
  3. Step 3: Contrast with Meeting Rooms I

    Original problem only checks feasibility; this requires optimization approach.
  4. Final Answer:

    Option B -> Option B
  5. Quick Check:

    Greedy by end time solves maximum meeting attendance [OK]
Quick Trick: Max meetings -> sort by end time, greedy select [OK]
Common Mistakes:
MISTAKES
  • Using overlap check only
  • Confusing start time sorting with end time sorting
Trap Explanation:
PITFALL
  • Candidates often try to reuse Meeting Rooms I approach without adapting to optimization variant.
Interviewer Note:
CONTEXT
  • Tests ability to adapt approach for problem variants.
Master "Meeting Rooms I" in Intervals

3 interactive learning modes - each teaches the same concept differently

Want More Practice?

15+ quiz questions · All difficulty levels · Free

Free Signup - Practice All Questions
More Intervals Quizzes