Bird
Raised Fist0

If the minimum cost tickets problem is extended to allow tickets covering fractional days (e.g., 1.5 days) with real-valued costs, which approach best adapts to solve this variant efficiently?

hard🔁 Follow-Up Q10 of Q15
Dynamic Programming: Knapsack - Minimum Cost for Tickets
If the minimum cost tickets problem is extended to allow tickets covering fractional days (e.g., 1.5 days) with real-valued costs, which approach best adapts to solve this variant efficiently?
AApply standard integer DP ignoring fractional parts
BUse continuous dynamic programming with discretized time intervals
CUse greedy algorithm selecting cheapest ticket repeatedly
DUse backtracking to try all ticket combinations
Step-by-Step Solution
Solution:
  1. Step 1: Understand fractional day coverage

    Tickets now cover fractional days, so travel days are no longer discrete integers.
  2. Step 2: Discretize timeline into small intervals

    Discretize the timeline into small intervals (e.g., half-days) to approximate fractional coverage.
  3. Step 3: Apply continuous DP over discretized intervals

    Apply DP over discretized intervals to compute minimum cost efficiently.
  4. Final Answer:

    Option B -> Option B
  5. Quick Check:

    Discretization enables DP on fractional intervals [OK]
Quick Trick: Discretize fractional days to apply DP [OK]
Common Mistakes:
MISTAKES
  • Ignoring fractional parts and using integer DP
  • Assuming greedy works for fractional coverage
  • Trying exhaustive backtracking which is inefficient
Trap Explanation:
PITFALL
  • Ignoring fractional days leads to incorrect or inefficient solutions
Interviewer Note:
CONTEXT
  • Tests ability to adapt DP to continuous or fractional problem variants
Master "Minimum Cost for Tickets" in Dynamic Programming: Knapsack

3 interactive learning modes - each teaches the same concept differently

Want More Practice?

15+ quiz questions · All difficulty levels · Free

Free Signup - Practice All Questions
More Dynamic Programming: Knapsack Quizzes