Practice
Solution
- Step 1: Identify who initiated -- self or manager-directed? -> Ownership
- Step 2: Identify scope -- cross-team coordination shows broad ownership.
- Step 3: Confirm result tracking -- demonstrates end-to-end responsibility.
- Conclusion: These signals align primarily with Ownership LP, not just Bias for Action or Deliver Results.
Solution
- Step 1: Identify who initiated -- self or manager-directed? -> Manager-assigned initiation, no self-start
- Step 2: Check for primary failure -- manager-assigned initiation is fatal for Ownership.
- Step 3: Secondary issues like weak reflection or vague actions exist but are not primary.
- Conclusion: The primary weakness is lack of self-initiation, destroying Ownership signal.
Solution
- Step 1: Identify who initiated -- self-initiated flagging.
- Step 2: Scope -- drove issue to zero shows end-to-end responsibility.
- Step 3: Result focus with quantification supports Ownership.
- Conclusion: This sentence signals Ownership primarily, not just Bias for Action or Deliver Results.
Solution
- Step 1: Identify who initiated -- manager assigned task.
- Step 2: Ownership requires self-initiation; manager assignment destroys ownership signal.
- Step 3: This phrase signals lack of ownership, not just time management or communication.
Solution
- Step 1: Identify who initiated -- candidate self-initiated investigation.
- Step 2: Check for disqualifiers -- "We collectively decided" subtly dilutes individual ownership.
- Step 3: Other elements show strong ownership, quantification, and proactive prevention.
- Conclusion: The subtle disqualifier is the shared decision phrase, weakening ownership signal.
