SciPy - Advanced Optimization
Which of the following is the correct syntax to call
dual_annealing on a function f with bounds [(0, 1), (0, 2)]?Which of the following is the correct syntax to call dual_annealing on a function f with bounds [(0, 1), (0, 2)]?
easy📝 Syntax Q3 of 15
Step-by-Step Solution
Solution:
Step 1: Recall the bounds parameter format
dual_annealing expects bounds as a list of tuples, each tuple defining (min, max) for a variable.Step 2: Check each option's bounds format
dual_annealing(f, bounds=[(0, 1), (0, 2)]) correctly uses a list of tuples. dual_annealing(f, bounds=(0, 1), (0, 2)) incorrectly separates tuples without a list. dual_annealing(f, bounds={(0, 1), (0, 2)}) uses a set, which is unordered. dual_annealing(f, bounds=[0, 1, 0, 2]) uses a flat list, which is invalid.Final Answer:
dual_annealing(f, bounds=[(0, 1), (0, 2)]) -> Option CQuick Check:
Bounds must be list of tuples = dual_annealing(f, bounds=[(0, 1), (0, 2)]) [OK]
Quick Trick: Bounds must be list of (min, max) tuples [OK]
Common Mistakes:
- Using sets instead of lists for bounds
- Passing bounds as separate arguments
- Using flat lists instead of tuples
Master "Advanced Optimization" in SciPy
Want More Practice?
15+ quiz questions · All difficulty levels · Free
Free Signup - Practice All QuestionsMore SciPy Quizzes