[Solved] What is the main issue with this custom error class definition?class NetworkError extends Error { constructor(message) { this.message = message; this.name = 'NetworkError'; } } | Node.js

Node.js - Error Handling Patterns

What is the main issue with this custom error class definition?

class NetworkError extends Error { constructor(message) { this.message = message; this.name = 'NetworkError'; } }

AThe class should not extend Error for custom errors.

BThe name property should not be set manually; it is set automatically.

CThe constructor does not call super(message), so the Error class is not properly initialized.

DThe constructor should not accept any parameters.

Step-by-Step Solution

Solution:

Step 1: Check constructor implementation
The constructor must call super(message) to initialize the base Error class properly.
Step 2: Identify missing super call
In the given code, super(message) is missing, so the error object won't have the correct message and stack trace.
Step 3: Confirm name property usage
Setting this.name is correct and necessary to identify the error type.
Final Answer:
The constructor does not call super(message), so the Error class is not properly initialized. correctly identifies the missing super call as the main issue.
Quick Check:
Constructor must call super(message) [OK]

Quick Trick: Always call super(message) in constructor [OK]

Common Mistakes:

Master "Error Handling Patterns" in Node.js

9 interactive learning modes - each teaches the same concept differently

More Node.js Quizzes

What is the main issue with this custom error class definition?