Bird
0
0

A case study shows a microservice architecture where services are split by business capability and use event-driven communication. What is a key advantage of this design?

hard📝 Trade-off Q8 of 15
Microservices - Real-World Architecture Case Studies
A case study shows a microservice architecture where services are split by business capability and use event-driven communication. What is a key advantage of this design?
ATighter integration causing slower deployments
BIncreased complexity with no performance gain
CReduced fault tolerance due to event dependencies
DImproved scalability and loose coupling between services
Step-by-Step Solution
Solution:
  1. Step 1: Analyze splitting by business capability and event-driven design

    This approach improves scalability and keeps services loosely coupled.
  2. Step 2: Evaluate other options for correctness

    The other options describe negative effects not typical of this design.
  3. Final Answer:

    Improved scalability and loose coupling between services -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    Business split + events = Scalability & loose coupling [OK]
Quick Trick: Split by business and use events for scalable, loose coupling [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Assuming event-driven adds no benefit
  • Thinking event dependencies reduce fault tolerance
  • Confusing tight integration with event-driven

Want More Practice?

15+ quiz questions · All difficulty levels · Free

Free Signup - Practice All Questions
More Microservices Quizzes