Microservices - Real-World Architecture Case Studies
A company wants to improve their microservices maturity from level 2 to level 4. Which combination of changes should they prioritize?
A company wants to improve their microservices maturity from level 2 to level 4. Which combination of changes should they prioritize?
hard📝 Trade-off Q15 of 15
Step-by-Step Solution
Solution:
Step 1: Identify level 2 and level 4 features
Level 2 includes dynamic service discovery; level 3 introduces failure handling; level 4 adds automation like deployment pipelines.Step 2: Match changes to maturity levels
Add dynamic service discovery, implement automated deployment pipelines, and introduce failure handling includes discovery (level 2), failure handling (level 3), and automation (level 4), covering needed improvements.Step 3: Eliminate incorrect options
Break monolith into services, add manual deployment, and use direct IP communication lacks automation and discovery; Implement retries and circuit breakers only, without automation or discovery misses automation; Focus on database scaling and ignore service communication ignores communication and automation.Final Answer:
Add dynamic service discovery, implement automated deployment pipelines, and introduce failure handling -> Option DQuick Check:
Level 2 to 4 = Discovery + Automation + Resilience [OK]
Quick Trick: Level 4 needs automation plus discovery and failure handling [OK]
Common Mistakes:
- Ignoring automation when moving to level 4
- Thinking only retries are enough
- Focusing on unrelated scaling aspects
Master "Real-World Architecture Case Studies" in Microservices
Want More Practice?
15+ quiz questions · All difficulty levels · Free
Free Signup - Practice All QuestionsMore Microservices Quizzes