[Solved] Which of the following is the correct JSON structure to define a custom IAM role binding? — Ans: {"bindings": [{"role": "roles/customRole", "members":... | GCP

GCP - Cloud IAM Advanced

Which of the following is the correct JSON structure to define a custom IAM role binding?

A{"bindings": [{"role": "roles/customRole", "members": ["user:alice@example.com"]}]}

B{"roles": [{"binding": "roles/customRole", "users": ["alice@example.com"]}]}

C{"policy": [{"role": "customRole", "members": ["user:alice@example.com"]}]}

D{"bindings": [{"role": "customRole", "members": ["alice@example.com"]}]}

Step-by-Step Solution

Solution:

Step 1: Recall correct IAM policy JSON format
The correct format uses "bindings" with "role" and "members" keys.
Step 2: Match correct syntax
{"bindings": [{"role": "roles/customRole", "members": ["user:alice@example.com"]}]} matches the correct structure with proper keys and user format.
Final Answer:
Correct JSON structure with bindings, role, and members keys. -> Option A
Quick Check:
IAM JSON format = {"bindings": [{"role": "roles/customRole", "members": ["user:alice@example.com"]}]} [OK]

Quick Trick: IAM JSON uses bindings with role and members keys [OK]

Common Mistakes:

Master "Cloud IAM Advanced" in GCP

9 interactive learning modes - each teaches the same concept differently

More GCP Quizzes

Which of the following is the correct JSON structure to define a custom IAM role binding?