Bird
0
0

Why might using cy.eq() with a negative index be preferred over chaining cy.last() and cy.eq() when selecting elements near the end of a list?

hard📝 Conceptual Q10 of 15
Cypress - Selecting Elements
Why might using cy.eq() with a negative index be preferred over chaining cy.last() and cy.eq() when selecting elements near the end of a list?
ABecause cy.eq() supports negative indices directly, making code simpler and more readable
BBecause cy.last() cannot be chained with eq() at all
CBecause negative indices in cy.eq() select elements from the start, not the end
DBecause cy.eq() with negative index throws an error, preventing mistakes
Step-by-Step Solution
Solution:
  1. Step 1: Understand negative index support in cy.eq()

    Cypress allows negative indices in cy.eq() to select elements counting from the end, e.g., eq(-1) is last element.
  2. Step 2: Compare with chaining cy.last() and eq()

    Chaining cy.last() and cy.eq() is not supported and complicates code unnecessarily.
  3. Final Answer:

    Because cy.eq() supports negative indices directly, making code simpler and more readable -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Negative index in eq() simplifies selecting from end [OK]
Quick Trick: Use negative index in eq() for clean end-element selection [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Thinking cy.last() can be chained with eq()
  • Believing negative indices count from start
  • Assuming negative index causes errors

Want More Practice?

15+ quiz questions · All difficulty levels · Free

Free Signup - Practice All Questions
More Cypress Quizzes